Comparative Performance of Collaborative Filtering Recommendations Methods for Explaining Recommendations

P. Valdiviezo-Diaz, Fernando Ortega
{"title":"Comparative Performance of Collaborative Filtering Recommendations Methods for Explaining Recommendations","authors":"P. Valdiviezo-Diaz, Fernando Ortega","doi":"10.1109/Incodtrin51881.2020.00036","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper a comparative performance of some collaborative filtering methods for recommender systems is presented. The literature review focuses on identifying some models for explaining of recommendations. Methods discussed here are those based on probabilistic models and based on biclustering techniques. In addition, we analyze a memory-based method and three recommendation probabilistic models, in order to know theirs performance and like these work. Experiments carried out using Netflix dataset presented good results for model-based methods compared to memory-based method, achieving the best performance using the Normalized Discounted Cumulative Gain (nDCG) quality measure and also in the recommendation and prediction accuracy.","PeriodicalId":170366,"journal":{"name":"2020 International Conference of Digital Transformation and Innovation Technology (Incodtrin)","volume":"6 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2020 International Conference of Digital Transformation and Innovation Technology (Incodtrin)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/Incodtrin51881.2020.00036","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this paper a comparative performance of some collaborative filtering methods for recommender systems is presented. The literature review focuses on identifying some models for explaining of recommendations. Methods discussed here are those based on probabilistic models and based on biclustering techniques. In addition, we analyze a memory-based method and three recommendation probabilistic models, in order to know theirs performance and like these work. Experiments carried out using Netflix dataset presented good results for model-based methods compared to memory-based method, achieving the best performance using the Normalized Discounted Cumulative Gain (nDCG) quality measure and also in the recommendation and prediction accuracy.
协同过滤推荐解释方法的性能比较
本文比较了推荐系统中几种协同过滤方法的性能。文献综述的重点是确定一些模型来解释建议。这里讨论的方法是基于概率模型和基于双聚类技术的方法。此外,我们分析了一种基于记忆的推荐方法和三种推荐概率模型,以了解它们的性能和对这些工作的喜爱。使用Netflix数据集进行的实验表明,与基于记忆的方法相比,基于模型的方法取得了良好的结果,使用归一化贴现累积增益(nDCG)质量度量以及推荐和预测精度都取得了最佳性能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信