Comparison of Rupatadine Monotherapy and Combined Levocetirizine with Ranitidine Dual Therapy for the Treatment of Chronic Idiopathic Urticaria

R. Gomes, K. Rahman, Dilruba Aktar, SM Matiur Rahman, Sharif M Rahman
{"title":"Comparison of Rupatadine Monotherapy and Combined Levocetirizine with Ranitidine Dual Therapy for the Treatment of Chronic Idiopathic Urticaria","authors":"R. Gomes, K. Rahman, Dilruba Aktar, SM Matiur Rahman, Sharif M Rahman","doi":"10.31579/2578-8949/081","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Effective treatment for chronic idiopathic urticaria (CIU) with conventional combined therapy comprising H1 and H2 antihistamine is effective but associated with high relapse rate. Newer H1 blocker rupatadine alone is similarly effective with less relapse rate. Also it is convenient for the patient as similar efficacy is obtained with single dosage compared to 3 times dosing in combined therapy. This study was done to compare the traditional treatment with levocetirizine and ranitidine to a newly introduced antihistamine rupatadine for CIU. Materials and Methods: The study was a hospital based prospective randomized control trial among 40 patients with CIU in Dermatology and Venereology department of Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujib Medical University(BSMMU), Dhaka from April 2020 to September 2020.Forty patients of CIU were randomly enrolled into two equal groups (group A and B). Patients of group-A were treated with 5 mg of levocetirizine once daily plus 150 mg of ranitidine twice orally daily and group-B were treated with rupatadine 10 mg once daily for one month. The efficacy was assessed 1st and 4th week during treatment and 4 weeks after completion of treatment by observing reduction of itching, regression of the size and shape of lesions and appearance of new lesions. Adverse effects and patient satisfaction were also noted. Results: 75% patients in group A and 80% patients in group B responded to treatment (p>0.05).80% in group A and 85% in group B showed improvement in itching in the first week (p>0.05). . At the end of 4 weeks 95% showed improvement in each group. Appearance of new lesions in first week was 10% and 5% (p>0.05) and at 4th week, 5% and 0% respectively (p>0.05). 75% in group A and 80% in group B had regression in their lesions at the end of first week (p>0.05). At the end of 4th week, it was 85% and 90% (p>0.05). 40% in group A and 25% in group B had relapse of itching at follow up (p<0.05). Relapse of lesions were 35% and 20% (p<0.05). Overall occurrence of side effects (3 compared to 1) was more in group A. Conclusion: The result of the present study show that both conventional treatment with levocetirizine and ranitidine combination and newer agent rupatadine alone has similar efficacy in reducing clinical sign and symptoms of CIU. But rupatadine has significantly reduced the relapse rate and so it is a more efficacious and also safer option with less adverse effects for the treatment of CIU in comparison to conventional treatment. Rupatadine is also more convenient option for patients in term of dosage schedule.","PeriodicalId":350109,"journal":{"name":"Dermatology and Dermatitis","volume":"31 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dermatology and Dermatitis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31579/2578-8949/081","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Effective treatment for chronic idiopathic urticaria (CIU) with conventional combined therapy comprising H1 and H2 antihistamine is effective but associated with high relapse rate. Newer H1 blocker rupatadine alone is similarly effective with less relapse rate. Also it is convenient for the patient as similar efficacy is obtained with single dosage compared to 3 times dosing in combined therapy. This study was done to compare the traditional treatment with levocetirizine and ranitidine to a newly introduced antihistamine rupatadine for CIU. Materials and Methods: The study was a hospital based prospective randomized control trial among 40 patients with CIU in Dermatology and Venereology department of Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujib Medical University(BSMMU), Dhaka from April 2020 to September 2020.Forty patients of CIU were randomly enrolled into two equal groups (group A and B). Patients of group-A were treated with 5 mg of levocetirizine once daily plus 150 mg of ranitidine twice orally daily and group-B were treated with rupatadine 10 mg once daily for one month. The efficacy was assessed 1st and 4th week during treatment and 4 weeks after completion of treatment by observing reduction of itching, regression of the size and shape of lesions and appearance of new lesions. Adverse effects and patient satisfaction were also noted. Results: 75% patients in group A and 80% patients in group B responded to treatment (p>0.05).80% in group A and 85% in group B showed improvement in itching in the first week (p>0.05). . At the end of 4 weeks 95% showed improvement in each group. Appearance of new lesions in first week was 10% and 5% (p>0.05) and at 4th week, 5% and 0% respectively (p>0.05). 75% in group A and 80% in group B had regression in their lesions at the end of first week (p>0.05). At the end of 4th week, it was 85% and 90% (p>0.05). 40% in group A and 25% in group B had relapse of itching at follow up (p<0.05). Relapse of lesions were 35% and 20% (p<0.05). Overall occurrence of side effects (3 compared to 1) was more in group A. Conclusion: The result of the present study show that both conventional treatment with levocetirizine and ranitidine combination and newer agent rupatadine alone has similar efficacy in reducing clinical sign and symptoms of CIU. But rupatadine has significantly reduced the relapse rate and so it is a more efficacious and also safer option with less adverse effects for the treatment of CIU in comparison to conventional treatment. Rupatadine is also more convenient option for patients in term of dosage schedule.
鲁帕他定单药与左西替利嗪联合雷尼替丁双药治疗慢性特发性荨麻疹的比较
背景:传统的H1和H2抗组胺联合治疗慢性特发性荨麻疹(CIU)有效,但复发率高。较新的H1阻滞剂鲁帕他定单独使用同样有效,复发率较低。此外,由于单次给药与3次联合给药的疗效相似,对患者也很方便。本研究比较了传统的左西替利嗪和雷尼替丁与新引入的抗组胺药鲁帕他定治疗CIU的疗效。材料与方法:该研究是一项基于医院的前瞻性随机对照试验,于2020年4月至2020年9月在达卡Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujib医科大学(BSMMU)皮肤性病科进行的40例CIU患者中进行。40例CIU患者随机分为两组(A组和B组),A组患者给予左西替利嗪5 mg / d +雷尼替丁150 mg / d,口服2次,B组患者给予鲁帕他定10 mg / d,口服1次,连续1个月。在治疗第1周、第4周和治疗结束后4周,通过观察瘙痒减轻、皮损大小和形状的消退以及新皮损的出现来评估疗效。不良反应和患者满意度也被记录下来。结果:A组有效率75%,B组有效率80% (p>0.05)。A组80%、B组85%患者第1周瘙痒症状改善(p>0.05)。4周后,两组患者均有95%的改善。第1周新发病变发生率为10%、5% (p>0.05),第4周新发病变发生率为5%、0% (p>0.05)。1周结束时,A组75%、B组80%的患者病灶消退(p>0.05)。第4周末分别为85%和90% (p>0.05)。A组40%、B组25%患者随访时瘙痒复发(p<0.05)。病变复发率分别为35%和20% (p<0.05)。a组总的不良反应发生率(3比1)较多。结论:本研究结果表明,左西替利嗪联合雷尼替丁常规治疗与新药物鲁帕他定单独治疗对减轻CIU临床体征和症状的疗效相似。但鲁帕他定显著降低了复发率,因此与常规治疗相比,它是治疗CIU的更有效,更安全的选择,副作用更小。鲁帕他定在给药方案上也为患者提供了更方便的选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信