On Disaster Risk Reduction in Norwegian Oil and Gas Industry Through Life-Cycle Perspective

Mihaela Ibrion, N. Paltrinieri, A. Nejad
{"title":"On Disaster Risk Reduction in Norwegian Oil and Gas Industry Through Life-Cycle Perspective","authors":"Mihaela Ibrion, N. Paltrinieri, A. Nejad","doi":"10.1115/omae2019-95622","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n This paper presents the risk reduction in Norwegian oil & gas industry over the time (1975–2016) through a life cycle perspective analysis with the aim to identify the critical stage(s) both in terms of accident occurrence and cause of the accident. Fifteen accidents, major accidents and disasters for example Ecofisk 2/4 Alpha 1975, Alexander L. Kielland 1980, Songa Endurance 2016 were studied. Cases from outside of the Norwegian offshore field — the Piper Alpha 1988, the Bourbon Dolphin 2007, and the Deep Water Horizon 2010 — were also considered as comparison. For each accident and through the life cycle analysis, the occurrence stage of the accident and its main technical causes were identified and compared. It was found that a high risk is concentrated in the Operation (In-Service) stage and associated Marine Operations. Furthermore, it was observed that a high number of accidents in oil and gas industry are associated with mobile structures. All the investigated accidents have acted as powerful reminders to the oil and gas industry that a continuous improvement of risk management and reduction of uncertainty are of paramount importance in order to ensure safe operations and risk reduction for accidents, major accidents and disasters. However, a reactive learning from major accidents and disasters needs to be supported by a proactive learning and development of a dynamic risk culture in the oil and gas industry.","PeriodicalId":314553,"journal":{"name":"Volume 3: Structures, Safety, and Reliability","volume":"38 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-06-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Volume 3: Structures, Safety, and Reliability","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1115/omae2019-95622","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

This paper presents the risk reduction in Norwegian oil & gas industry over the time (1975–2016) through a life cycle perspective analysis with the aim to identify the critical stage(s) both in terms of accident occurrence and cause of the accident. Fifteen accidents, major accidents and disasters for example Ecofisk 2/4 Alpha 1975, Alexander L. Kielland 1980, Songa Endurance 2016 were studied. Cases from outside of the Norwegian offshore field — the Piper Alpha 1988, the Bourbon Dolphin 2007, and the Deep Water Horizon 2010 — were also considered as comparison. For each accident and through the life cycle analysis, the occurrence stage of the accident and its main technical causes were identified and compared. It was found that a high risk is concentrated in the Operation (In-Service) stage and associated Marine Operations. Furthermore, it was observed that a high number of accidents in oil and gas industry are associated with mobile structures. All the investigated accidents have acted as powerful reminders to the oil and gas industry that a continuous improvement of risk management and reduction of uncertainty are of paramount importance in order to ensure safe operations and risk reduction for accidents, major accidents and disasters. However, a reactive learning from major accidents and disasters needs to be supported by a proactive learning and development of a dynamic risk culture in the oil and gas industry.
从生命周期角度看挪威油气行业减少灾害风险
本文通过生命周期角度分析,介绍了挪威石油和天然气行业在1975-2016年间的风险降低情况,旨在确定事故发生和事故原因的关键阶段。研究了Ecofisk 2/4 Alpha 1975、Alexander L. Kielland 1980、Songa Endurance 2016等15起事故、重大事故和灾害。挪威近海油田以外的案例——Piper Alpha 1988、Bourbon Dolphin 2007和Deep Water Horizon 2010——也被作为比较。针对每一起事故,通过生命周期分析,确定并比较事故发生阶段及其主要技术原因。发现高风险集中在作业(服役)阶段和相关的海上作业。此外,据观察,石油和天然气工业中的大量事故与移动结构有关。所有被调查的事故都有力地提醒了油气行业,为了确保安全运营,降低事故、重大事故和灾害的风险,持续改进风险管理和减少不确定性至关重要。然而,在油气行业中,从重大事故和灾害中被动学习需要通过主动学习和动态风险文化的发展来支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信