Self-Determination in Maths Education: How to Strengthen Students’ Positive Attitude to Mathematics and Develop Their Emotional/Social Competences

Tomasz Knopik, Urszula Oszwa
{"title":"Self-Determination in Maths Education: How to Strengthen Students’ Positive Attitude to Mathematics and Develop Their Emotional/Social Competences","authors":"Tomasz Knopik, Urszula Oszwa","doi":"10.35765/mjse.2023.1223.08","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The aim of this study was to verify the effectiveness of the self-determination theory (SDT) in mathematics teaching methodology. In the experimental group, 62 fifth-graders had 10 months of maths lessons according to an original programme that prioritises three needs: autonomy, competence and relatedness. \nThe following research questions were formulated: \n \nHow did students’ attitudes towards mathematics change under the influence of methodological interventions aimed at satisfying the three SDT needs? \nDid the methodological solutions contribute to better emotional/social competences in the students? \nDid the intervention result in higher maths achievement, measured by a maths knowledge and skills test and grades in the subject? \n \nThe findings included statistically significant differences in 1) positive attitude towards mathematics (measured by the semantic differential technique), 2) emotional/social competences (measured by the KA scale from the tool called TROS-KA) and 3) mathematical achievements (measured by a maths test and grades in school) in comparison to the control group (N = 59), where less positive attitudes towards mathematics, lower maths grades and no significant increase in emotional/social competences were observed.","PeriodicalId":162271,"journal":{"name":"Multidisciplinary Journal of School Education","volume":"29 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Multidisciplinary Journal of School Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35765/mjse.2023.1223.08","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The aim of this study was to verify the effectiveness of the self-determination theory (SDT) in mathematics teaching methodology. In the experimental group, 62 fifth-graders had 10 months of maths lessons according to an original programme that prioritises three needs: autonomy, competence and relatedness. The following research questions were formulated: How did students’ attitudes towards mathematics change under the influence of methodological interventions aimed at satisfying the three SDT needs? Did the methodological solutions contribute to better emotional/social competences in the students? Did the intervention result in higher maths achievement, measured by a maths knowledge and skills test and grades in the subject? The findings included statistically significant differences in 1) positive attitude towards mathematics (measured by the semantic differential technique), 2) emotional/social competences (measured by the KA scale from the tool called TROS-KA) and 3) mathematical achievements (measured by a maths test and grades in school) in comparison to the control group (N = 59), where less positive attitudes towards mathematics, lower maths grades and no significant increase in emotional/social competences were observed.
数学教育中的自我决定:如何加强学生对数学的积极态度和发展他们的情感/社会能力
本研究的目的是验证自我决定理论(SDT)在数学教学方法论中的有效性。在实验组中,62名五年级学生接受了为期10个月的数学课程,该课程按照一个优先考虑三个需求的原始计划进行:自主性、能力和相关性。我们制定了以下研究问题:在旨在满足三个SDT需求的方法学干预的影响下,学生对数学的态度是如何变化的?方法论解决方案是否有助于提高学生的情感/社会能力?通过数学知识和技能测试和科目成绩来衡量,干预是否导致了更高的数学成绩?研究结果包括与对照组(N = 59)相比,1)对数学的积极态度(通过语义差异技术测量),2)情感/社会能力(通过TROS-KA工具的KA量表测量)和3)数学成就(通过数学测试和学校成绩测量)在统计学上具有显著差异,其中对数学的积极态度较差,数学成绩较低,情感/社会能力没有显著提高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信