Influence of screw head diameter on ex vivo fixation of equine lateral condylar fractures with 5.5 mm cortical screws.

C. Constant, I. Zderic, D. Arens, Brenna Pugliese, D. Gehweiler, Boyko Gueorguiev‐Rüegg, S. Zeiter
{"title":"Influence of screw head diameter on ex vivo fixation of equine lateral condylar fractures with 5.5 mm cortical screws.","authors":"C. Constant, I. Zderic, D. Arens, Brenna Pugliese, D. Gehweiler, Boyko Gueorguiev‐Rüegg, S. Zeiter","doi":"10.1111/vsu.13797","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"OBJECTIVE\nTo determine the influence of screw head diameter on equine condylar fracture fixation with 5.5 mm cortical screws.\n\n\nSTUDY DESIGN\nEx vivo, biomechanical study, blinded, matched-pair design.\n\n\nSAMPLE POPULATION\nFifteen pairs of equine third metacarpal (MC3) bones.\n\n\nMETHODS\nLateral condylar fractures were simulated by parasagittal osteotomies and repaired pairwise by 2 × 5.5 mm cortical screws of 8 mm (standard) or 10 mm (modified) head diameter. Interfragmentary compression at maximum screw insertion torque was measured. The instrumented specimens were pairwise stratified for biomechanical testing under the following modalities (n = 5): (1) screw insertion torque to failure, (2) quasi-static axial load to failure, and (3) cyclic axial load to 2 mm displacement followed by failure. Tests (1) and (2) were analyzed for yield, maximum, and failure torque/angle and load/displacement, respectively. Number of cycles to 2 mm displacement and failure was assessed from test (3).\n\n\nRESULTS\nMaximum insertion torque was greater, and failure angle smaller, when constructs repaired with modified screws were tested (8.1 ± 0.5 vs. 7.4 ± 0.5 Nm; P = .0047 and 550 ± 104 vs. 1130 ± 230; P = .008). Axial yield (7118 ± 707 vs. 5740 ± 2267 N; P = .043) and failure load (12 347 ± 3359 vs. 8695 ± 2277 N; P = .043) were greater for specimens repaired with modified screws. No difference was detected between constructs in the number of cycles to 2 mm displacement.\n\n\nCONCLUSION\nCondylar MC3 osteotomies repaired with modified 5.5 mm cortical screws sustained greater maximal hand torque insertion, smaller insertion failure angle and 1.4 fold greater quasi-static failure forces than constructs repaired with standard 5.5 mm screws.\n\n\nCLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE\nUse of modified screws with larger heads may improve the fixation of condylar fractures in horses. These results provide evidence to justify clinical evaluation in horses undergoing fracture repair.","PeriodicalId":123280,"journal":{"name":"Veterinary surgery : VS","volume":"19 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Veterinary surgery : VS","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/vsu.13797","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

OBJECTIVE To determine the influence of screw head diameter on equine condylar fracture fixation with 5.5 mm cortical screws. STUDY DESIGN Ex vivo, biomechanical study, blinded, matched-pair design. SAMPLE POPULATION Fifteen pairs of equine third metacarpal (MC3) bones. METHODS Lateral condylar fractures were simulated by parasagittal osteotomies and repaired pairwise by 2 × 5.5 mm cortical screws of 8 mm (standard) or 10 mm (modified) head diameter. Interfragmentary compression at maximum screw insertion torque was measured. The instrumented specimens were pairwise stratified for biomechanical testing under the following modalities (n = 5): (1) screw insertion torque to failure, (2) quasi-static axial load to failure, and (3) cyclic axial load to 2 mm displacement followed by failure. Tests (1) and (2) were analyzed for yield, maximum, and failure torque/angle and load/displacement, respectively. Number of cycles to 2 mm displacement and failure was assessed from test (3). RESULTS Maximum insertion torque was greater, and failure angle smaller, when constructs repaired with modified screws were tested (8.1 ± 0.5 vs. 7.4 ± 0.5 Nm; P = .0047 and 550 ± 104 vs. 1130 ± 230; P = .008). Axial yield (7118 ± 707 vs. 5740 ± 2267 N; P = .043) and failure load (12 347 ± 3359 vs. 8695 ± 2277 N; P = .043) were greater for specimens repaired with modified screws. No difference was detected between constructs in the number of cycles to 2 mm displacement. CONCLUSION Condylar MC3 osteotomies repaired with modified 5.5 mm cortical screws sustained greater maximal hand torque insertion, smaller insertion failure angle and 1.4 fold greater quasi-static failure forces than constructs repaired with standard 5.5 mm screws. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE Use of modified screws with larger heads may improve the fixation of condylar fractures in horses. These results provide evidence to justify clinical evaluation in horses undergoing fracture repair.
螺钉头直径对5.5 mm皮质螺钉固定马外侧髁骨折的影响。
目的探讨钉头直径对5.5 mm皮质螺钉固定马髁骨折的影响。研究设计:活体生物力学研究,盲法配对设计。15对马第三掌骨(MC3)骨。方法采用矢状旁截骨术模拟髁侧骨折,采用2 × 5.5 mm头径为8 mm(标准)或10 mm(改良)的皮质螺钉两两修复。测量了最大螺杆插入扭矩下的碎片间压缩。在以下模式(n = 5)下,将仪器标本两两分层进行生物力学测试:(1)螺钉插入扭矩失效,(2)准静态轴向载荷失效,(3)循环轴向载荷至2mm位移失效。分别对试验(1)和(2)进行屈服、最大和失效扭矩/角度和负载/位移的分析。从试验(3)中评估到2 mm位移和破坏的循环次数。结果当使用改良螺钉修复构建体时,最大插入扭矩更大,破坏角更小(8.1±0.5 vs. 7.4±0.5 Nm;P = 0.0047和550±104 vs. 1130±230;p = .008)。轴向屈服(7118±707 vs 5740±2267 N;P = 0.043)和失效载荷(12 347±3359∶8695±2277 N;P = 0.043),改良螺钉修复标本的差异更大。在2毫米位移的循环次数上,不同构造之间没有发现差异。结论改良5.5 mm皮质螺钉修复髁突MC3截骨术后的最大入针手转矩、入针失效角较小,准静态失效力是标准5.5 mm螺钉修复体的1.4倍。临床意义使用改良的大头螺钉可以改善马髁骨折的固定。这些结果为马匹骨折修复的临床评估提供了依据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信