{"title":"Quest of Data Colonialism and Cyber Sovereignty: India’s Strategic Position in Cyberspace","authors":"Shubhendu Gupta, Reeta Sony","doi":"10.17323/2713-2749.2021.2.68.81","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The dawn of the neocolonial project has seen the emergence of a new space: data. Data is a raw material that can be stitched, processed and marketed in the same way as the East India Company (EIC) used to do with India’s cotton. EIC, which started as one of the world’s first joint-stock companies, turned into a wild beast, building a corporate lobby with the help of lawyers and MP shareholders to amend legislation in its favor. The EIC became a particularly atrocious and innovative colonial project that directly or indirectly controlled continents, thanks to an army larger than the army of any nation-state at the time. The Drain Theory of Dadabhai Naroji have opened India’s eyes to how the EIC was taking raw material from the country and converting it into a finished product that was marketed in India again in the same way as raw data is being processed outside India and then marketed here today. In today’s digital era, big corporations need not own big armies, as companies are protected by nation-states and bailed out when required. Today, one does not need to travel overseas to explore and conquer Gold, God and Glory; instead, they are a click away. The neocolonial project runs on digital platforms, while the popular narrative of bridging the digital divide and giving internet access to millions of people resembles the idea of the “white savior” liberating the “noble savage” through modern Western education. Facebook’s grand plan of providing free internet to all can be best understood as a neocolonial strategy to mine the data of billions by equating it with water and land. Similarly, the Cambridge Analytica scandal provides an example of how neocolonial forces can influence the fundamental democratic process of electing a government. Therefore, nations endorsing democratic values should be especially wary of the trap of neocolonialist forces, as such nations are particularly vulnerable to their project. This paper critically study the cyber security infrastructure and policies in India and analyze the India’s approach towards cyber sovereignty and data colonialism and thereafter examine the India’s strategic position in cyberspace and suggest policy recommendations.","PeriodicalId":410740,"journal":{"name":"Legal Issues in the Digital Age","volume":"63 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Legal Issues in the Digital Age","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17323/2713-2749.2021.2.68.81","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
Abstract
The dawn of the neocolonial project has seen the emergence of a new space: data. Data is a raw material that can be stitched, processed and marketed in the same way as the East India Company (EIC) used to do with India’s cotton. EIC, which started as one of the world’s first joint-stock companies, turned into a wild beast, building a corporate lobby with the help of lawyers and MP shareholders to amend legislation in its favor. The EIC became a particularly atrocious and innovative colonial project that directly or indirectly controlled continents, thanks to an army larger than the army of any nation-state at the time. The Drain Theory of Dadabhai Naroji have opened India’s eyes to how the EIC was taking raw material from the country and converting it into a finished product that was marketed in India again in the same way as raw data is being processed outside India and then marketed here today. In today’s digital era, big corporations need not own big armies, as companies are protected by nation-states and bailed out when required. Today, one does not need to travel overseas to explore and conquer Gold, God and Glory; instead, they are a click away. The neocolonial project runs on digital platforms, while the popular narrative of bridging the digital divide and giving internet access to millions of people resembles the idea of the “white savior” liberating the “noble savage” through modern Western education. Facebook’s grand plan of providing free internet to all can be best understood as a neocolonial strategy to mine the data of billions by equating it with water and land. Similarly, the Cambridge Analytica scandal provides an example of how neocolonial forces can influence the fundamental democratic process of electing a government. Therefore, nations endorsing democratic values should be especially wary of the trap of neocolonialist forces, as such nations are particularly vulnerable to their project. This paper critically study the cyber security infrastructure and policies in India and analyze the India’s approach towards cyber sovereignty and data colonialism and thereafter examine the India’s strategic position in cyberspace and suggest policy recommendations.
新殖民主义项目的曙光见证了一个新空间的出现:数据。数据是一种原材料,可以被缝制、加工和销售,就像东印度公司(East India Company, EIC)过去处理印度棉花一样。EIC最初是世界上最早的股份制公司之一,后来变成了一头野兽,在律师和国会议员股东的帮助下,建立了一个企业游说团体,以修改有利于自己的立法。EIC成为了一个特别残暴和创新的殖民项目,直接或间接地控制了各大洲,这要归功于当时一支比任何民族国家的军队都要庞大的军队。Dadabhai Naroji的流失理论让印度人看到了EIC是如何从印度获取原材料,并将其转化为成品,再在印度销售的,就像印度境外处理原始数据,然后在这里销售一样。在当今的数字时代,大公司不需要拥有庞大的军队,因为公司受到民族国家的保护,并在需要时得到纾困。今天,人们不需要到海外去探索和征服黄金、上帝和荣耀;相反,他们是一个点击。新殖民主义项目在数字平台上运行,而弥合数字鸿沟、让数百万人接入互联网的流行说法,类似于“白人救世主”通过现代西方教育解放“高贵野蛮人”的想法。Facebook向所有人提供免费互联网的宏伟计划,最好被理解为一种新殖民主义战略,通过将互联网等同于水和土地,来挖掘数十亿人的数据。同样,剑桥分析公司丑闻提供了一个例子,说明新殖民主义势力如何影响选举政府的基本民主过程。因此,支持民主价值观的国家应特别警惕新殖民主义势力的陷阱,因为这些国家特别容易受到新殖民主义计划的影响。本文批判性地研究了印度的网络安全基础设施和政策,分析了印度对网络主权和数据殖民主义的态度,随后研究了印度在网络空间的战略地位,并提出了政策建议。