Equality as an ethical concept within the context of nursing care rationing.

E. Papastavrou, M. Igoumenidis, C. Lemonidou
{"title":"Equality as an ethical concept within the context of nursing care rationing.","authors":"E. Papastavrou, M. Igoumenidis, C. Lemonidou","doi":"10.1111/nup.12284","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The concept of equality is subject to many different interpretations, and it is closely connected to similar concepts such as equity, justice, fairness, and human rights. As an ideal, equality entails many aspects that are untenable. For instance, genetic and social inequalities may never be extinct, but they can both be ameliorated by proper distribution of society's resources. Likewise, within the context of health care, equality can be promoted by proper rationing of health resources, amongst which nursing care stands out. In the field of nursing, the principle of equality presents itself in various forms of ethical and deontological mandates. However, beyond good intentions and abstract notions, there is a need to examine the ways in which nurses enforce this principle in practice, within the reality of modern health systems. Although there is scarcity of qualitative evidence in the nursing care rationing literature, existing studies suggest that fair treatment pertains to a largely intuitive sense of equality which involves subjective perceptions and judgements about rationing. Nurses' initial predisposition is to view all patients as equal and treat them in an equal manner; yet, on an individual basis, each patient has a different starting point, different needs and different prospects that render rationing decisions complex and uncertain. Equality should be accepted with its unavoidable limitations in practice and be further examined within the context of nursing care rationing, in the hope that it can be advanced in a consistent way, despite the idealistic nature in many of its aspects.","PeriodicalId":391694,"journal":{"name":"Nursing philosophy : an international journal for healthcare professionals","volume":"24 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nursing philosophy : an international journal for healthcare professionals","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/nup.12284","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

The concept of equality is subject to many different interpretations, and it is closely connected to similar concepts such as equity, justice, fairness, and human rights. As an ideal, equality entails many aspects that are untenable. For instance, genetic and social inequalities may never be extinct, but they can both be ameliorated by proper distribution of society's resources. Likewise, within the context of health care, equality can be promoted by proper rationing of health resources, amongst which nursing care stands out. In the field of nursing, the principle of equality presents itself in various forms of ethical and deontological mandates. However, beyond good intentions and abstract notions, there is a need to examine the ways in which nurses enforce this principle in practice, within the reality of modern health systems. Although there is scarcity of qualitative evidence in the nursing care rationing literature, existing studies suggest that fair treatment pertains to a largely intuitive sense of equality which involves subjective perceptions and judgements about rationing. Nurses' initial predisposition is to view all patients as equal and treat them in an equal manner; yet, on an individual basis, each patient has a different starting point, different needs and different prospects that render rationing decisions complex and uncertain. Equality should be accepted with its unavoidable limitations in practice and be further examined within the context of nursing care rationing, in the hope that it can be advanced in a consistent way, despite the idealistic nature in many of its aspects.
平等作为一个伦理概念在护理配给的背景下。
平等的概念有许多不同的解释,它与平等、正义、公平和人权等类似的概念密切相关。作为一种理想,平等包含了许多站不住脚的方面。例如,遗传不平等和社会不平等可能永远不会消失,但它们都可以通过合理分配社会资源而得到改善。同样,在卫生保健方面,可以通过适当的卫生资源配给来促进平等,其中护理工作尤为突出。在护理领域,平等的原则以各种形式的伦理和义务要求呈现出来。然而,除了良好的意图和抽象的概念之外,还需要在现代卫生系统的现实中审查护士在实践中执行这一原则的方式。虽然在护理配给文献中缺乏定性证据,但现有的研究表明,公平待遇与一种很大程度上直观的平等感有关,这涉及到对配给的主观感知和判断。护士最初的倾向是平等对待所有病人,以平等的方式对待他们;然而,在个体基础上,每个病人都有不同的起点、不同的需求和不同的前景,这使得配给决策变得复杂和不确定。平等应该在实践中接受其不可避免的局限性,并在护理配给的背景下进一步检查,希望它能够以一致的方式推进,尽管在许多方面具有理想主义性质。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信