Discourse markers and L2 listening: do computers make a difference in L2 listening comprehension?

Nuray Alagözlü
{"title":"Discourse markers and L2 listening: do computers make a difference in L2 listening comprehension?","authors":"Nuray Alagözlü","doi":"10.36505/exling-2008/02/0001/000060","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study explores whether discourse markers play a role in L2 listening comprehension and whether software programs make a difference in L2 listening comprehension. Two groups of approximately 25 freshman students listened to two versions of three different talks with and without higher order discourse markers. The talks were delivered by a native speaker, a non-native speaker and by a software listening program (NaturalReader© 7.0). The scorings, compared using the MannWhitney U test, indicate that discourse markers play a significant role only in native speaker speech (p<0,05). It is seen that the highest mean of comprehension is found in the talks delivered by the native speaker. Computers ranked second in providing more comprehensive talks.","PeriodicalId":447857,"journal":{"name":"ISCA Tutorial and Research Workshop on Experimental Linguistics","volume":"151 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ISCA Tutorial and Research Workshop on Experimental Linguistics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36505/exling-2008/02/0001/000060","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study explores whether discourse markers play a role in L2 listening comprehension and whether software programs make a difference in L2 listening comprehension. Two groups of approximately 25 freshman students listened to two versions of three different talks with and without higher order discourse markers. The talks were delivered by a native speaker, a non-native speaker and by a software listening program (NaturalReader© 7.0). The scorings, compared using the MannWhitney U test, indicate that discourse markers play a significant role only in native speaker speech (p<0,05). It is seen that the highest mean of comprehension is found in the talks delivered by the native speaker. Computers ranked second in providing more comprehensive talks.
话语标记与二语听力:计算机对二语听力理解有影响吗?
本研究探讨语篇标记是否在二语听力理解中发挥作用,以及软件程序是否对二语听力理解产生影响。两组大约25名大一学生分别听了三个不同版本的谈话,其中有和没有高阶话语标记。讲座由一名母语人士、一名非母语人士和一个软件听力程序(NaturalReader©7.0)提供。使用MannWhitney U检验比较得分,表明话语标记仅在本族语者言语中起显著作用(p< 0.05)。可以看出,最高的理解水平出现在母语人士的演讲中。计算机在提供更全面的讲座方面排名第二。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信