Leave No Trace, Willful Unknowing, and Implications From the Ethics of Sustainability for Solution-Focused Practice Outdoors

Stephan Natynczuk, Will W. Dobud
{"title":"Leave No Trace, Willful Unknowing, and Implications From the Ethics of Sustainability for Solution-Focused Practice Outdoors","authors":"Stephan Natynczuk, Will W. Dobud","doi":"10.59874/001c.75049","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Taking talking therapy outdoors is becoming increasingly popular, especially gaining traction in response to COVID restrictions on what can be done face-to-face indoors, and with increasing awareness of benefits from being outdoors in nature (Ewert & Davidson, 2021). In this paper, we draw on ethics of sustainability from the outdoor activity sector to look for metaphors for therapeutic practice outdoors, especially solution-focused brief therapy. We start with what is currently regarded as good practice for the preservation and conservation of the environments and habitats we frequent. We then develop these tenets of ethics, such as Leave No Trace, as metaphors for deliberate solution-focused therapeutic work outdoors, especially with regard to honoring the voices of our clients. Metaphors are provided to demonstrate why, and how, outdoor therapy practitioners should aim to ‘leave no trace’ in the lives of those they serve, as they would leave no trace of their presence on the land they travel. We illustrate how our practice can draw on sustainability ethics to enable the decolonization of our solution-focused outdoor work (Mlcek, 2017), and consider how a privilege-aware approach to practice can be used to help ‘decolonize’ therapeutic practice. We suggest that solution-focused approaches to outdoor therapy require additional work in counseling theory and ethics to supplement outdoor leadership qualifications.","PeriodicalId":137801,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Solution Focused Practices","volume":"5 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Solution Focused Practices","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.59874/001c.75049","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Taking talking therapy outdoors is becoming increasingly popular, especially gaining traction in response to COVID restrictions on what can be done face-to-face indoors, and with increasing awareness of benefits from being outdoors in nature (Ewert & Davidson, 2021). In this paper, we draw on ethics of sustainability from the outdoor activity sector to look for metaphors for therapeutic practice outdoors, especially solution-focused brief therapy. We start with what is currently regarded as good practice for the preservation and conservation of the environments and habitats we frequent. We then develop these tenets of ethics, such as Leave No Trace, as metaphors for deliberate solution-focused therapeutic work outdoors, especially with regard to honoring the voices of our clients. Metaphors are provided to demonstrate why, and how, outdoor therapy practitioners should aim to ‘leave no trace’ in the lives of those they serve, as they would leave no trace of their presence on the land they travel. We illustrate how our practice can draw on sustainability ethics to enable the decolonization of our solution-focused outdoor work (Mlcek, 2017), and consider how a privilege-aware approach to practice can be used to help ‘decolonize’ therapeutic practice. We suggest that solution-focused approaches to outdoor therapy require additional work in counseling theory and ethics to supplement outdoor leadership qualifications.
不留痕迹,故意不知道,以及可持续发展伦理对户外解决方案实践的影响
在户外进行谈话治疗正变得越来越受欢迎,尤其是在应对COVID限制室内面对面活动的情况下,以及人们越来越意识到户外大自然的好处(Ewert & Davidson, 2021)。在本文中,我们从户外活动部门借鉴可持续性伦理来寻找户外治疗实践的隐喻,特别是以解决方案为重点的简短治疗。我们从目前被认为是保护和保护我们经常光顾的环境和栖息地的良好做法开始。然后,我们发展了这些道德原则,如不留痕迹,作为对户外治疗工作的隐喻,特别是在尊重客户的声音方面。书中提供了一些隐喻来说明为什么,以及如何,户外治疗从业者应该以在他们服务的人的生活中“不留痕迹”为目标,因为他们不会在他们旅行的土地上留下任何痕迹。我们说明了我们的实践如何利用可持续性伦理来实现我们以解决方案为中心的户外工作的非殖民化(Mlcek, 2017),并考虑如何使用特权意识的实践方法来帮助“非殖民化”治疗实践。我们建议以解决方案为中心的户外治疗方法需要在咨询理论和伦理方面进行额外的工作,以补充户外领导资格。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信