Problem gambling—a Lacanian Real

A. Borch
{"title":"Problem gambling—a Lacanian Real","authors":"A. Borch","doi":"10.7895/IJADR.V4I1.197","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Borch, A. (2015). Problem gambling—a Lacanian Real.  The International Journal Of Alcohol And Drug Research, 4 (1), 71-76. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.7895/ijadr.v4i1.197 The concept of addiction has been criticized for being mainly based on self-reporting in therapeutic and research settings, and that it is functional for people in these settings to report that they are addicted—driven by forces beyond their capacity to control. In this paper, I take this criticism seriously into account and argue that problem gambling belongs to the Lacanian Real, in short, referring to those parts of our existence that might be sensed and even acknowledged, but that never can be wholly grasped. Based on qualitative research of households with reported gambling problems, I argue that neither problem gamblers nor their spouses seem to know why the person gambles and why he or she keeps on gambling even though s/he knows it is damaging. The unknown and incomprehensible aspects of problem gambling (the Real) tend, as part of the gambler’s process of ‘recovering,’ to be repressed and replaced with the concept of addiction. This repression mechanism is observed in other contexts as well, not least in scientific milieux studying gambling, and reflects interests and power in society. Exploring the addiction concept from a critical point of view is necessary to sort truth from myth and make scientific enhancements.","PeriodicalId":162336,"journal":{"name":"The International Journal of Alcohol and Drug Research","volume":"62 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-06-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The International Journal of Alcohol and Drug Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7895/IJADR.V4I1.197","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Borch, A. (2015). Problem gambling—a Lacanian Real.  The International Journal Of Alcohol And Drug Research, 4 (1), 71-76. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.7895/ijadr.v4i1.197 The concept of addiction has been criticized for being mainly based on self-reporting in therapeutic and research settings, and that it is functional for people in these settings to report that they are addicted—driven by forces beyond their capacity to control. In this paper, I take this criticism seriously into account and argue that problem gambling belongs to the Lacanian Real, in short, referring to those parts of our existence that might be sensed and even acknowledged, but that never can be wholly grasped. Based on qualitative research of households with reported gambling problems, I argue that neither problem gamblers nor their spouses seem to know why the person gambles and why he or she keeps on gambling even though s/he knows it is damaging. The unknown and incomprehensible aspects of problem gambling (the Real) tend, as part of the gambler’s process of ‘recovering,’ to be repressed and replaced with the concept of addiction. This repression mechanism is observed in other contexts as well, not least in scientific milieux studying gambling, and reflects interests and power in society. Exploring the addiction concept from a critical point of view is necessary to sort truth from myth and make scientific enhancements.
问题赌博——拉康式的真实
Borch, A.(2015)。问题赌博——拉康式的真实。《国际酒精和药物研究杂志》,4(1),71-76。doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.7895/ijadr.v4i1.197成瘾的概念因主要基于治疗和研究环境中的自我报告而受到批评,并且在这些环境中,人们报告他们成瘾是由他们无法控制的力量驱动的,这是有效的。在这篇论文中,我将严肃地考虑这个批评,并论证问题赌博属于拉康的真实,简而言之,指的是我们存在的那些部分,它们可能被感觉,甚至被承认,但永远不能被完全掌握。根据对报告有赌博问题的家庭的定性研究,我认为问题赌徒和他们的配偶似乎都不知道为什么这个人赌博,为什么他或她明知赌博是有害的,也要继续赌博。问题赌博(真实)的未知和不可理解的方面,作为赌徒“恢复”过程的一部分,往往被压抑,并被成瘾的概念所取代。这种抑制机制在其他环境中也可以观察到,尤其是在研究赌博的科学环境中,它反映了社会中的利益和权力。从批判的角度对成瘾概念进行探索,是理出真相、科学完善的必要条件。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信