Gendered Performance Differences in Information Technology Courses

Rebekah Michael, Hazem Said
{"title":"Gendered Performance Differences in Information Technology Courses","authors":"Rebekah Michael, Hazem Said","doi":"10.1145/3368308.3415395","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aims to analyze patterns of gender-based grade disparity in undergraduate information technology (IT) courses at a public research university. The study is part of an effort to understand factors in IT education that may contribute to the gender gap in IT higher education and careers. The study followed a learning analytics methodology developed and used by previous studies of gendered based performance differences in STEM courses at other universities. This research adds to a base of information on gender performance in IT courses. Results indicated that, on average, IT courses have gendered performance differences, with most courses favoring males. Also, results found that, on average, the course delivery method does not impact gender performance. A surprising result is in the senior-level courses, on average, the courses favor females. The recommendations for expanding the study are to examine additional course factors such as instructor gender, class size, and the number of females in the course and to include additional computing disciplines and other universities in the data set. This study will lead to a research path to understanding gender neutral IT course instruction.","PeriodicalId":374890,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 21st Annual Conference on Information Technology Education","volume":"18 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 21st Annual Conference on Information Technology Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3368308.3415395","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

This study aims to analyze patterns of gender-based grade disparity in undergraduate information technology (IT) courses at a public research university. The study is part of an effort to understand factors in IT education that may contribute to the gender gap in IT higher education and careers. The study followed a learning analytics methodology developed and used by previous studies of gendered based performance differences in STEM courses at other universities. This research adds to a base of information on gender performance in IT courses. Results indicated that, on average, IT courses have gendered performance differences, with most courses favoring males. Also, results found that, on average, the course delivery method does not impact gender performance. A surprising result is in the senior-level courses, on average, the courses favor females. The recommendations for expanding the study are to examine additional course factors such as instructor gender, class size, and the number of females in the course and to include additional computing disciplines and other universities in the data set. This study will lead to a research path to understanding gender neutral IT course instruction.
信息技术课程的性别表现差异
本研究旨在分析某公立研究型大学本科信息技术(IT)课程的性别成绩差异模式。这项研究旨在了解信息技术教育中可能导致信息技术高等教育和职业性别差异的因素。这项研究采用了一种学习分析方法,该方法被其他大学基于性别的STEM课程表现差异研究所开发和使用。这项研究增加了信息技术课程中性别表现的信息基础。结果表明,平均而言,IT课程存在性别表现差异,大多数课程倾向于男性。此外,结果发现,平均而言,课程交付方式不会影响性别表现。一个令人惊讶的结果是,在高级课程中,平均而言,课程倾向于女性。扩大研究的建议是检查其他课程因素,如讲师性别、班级规模和课程中的女性人数,并在数据集中包括其他计算学科和其他大学。本研究将导向一条理解性别中立资讯科技课程教学的研究路径。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信