Existing Ethical Principles and their Application to Personal Medicine

A. Cuticchia
{"title":"Existing Ethical Principles and their Application to Personal Medicine","authors":"A. Cuticchia","doi":"10.2174/1874761200802010029","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Human Genome Project was created with the ultimate goal of improving human health. Since its inception, the majority of funding has gone to the development of technologies and the creation of massive data sets. The applica- tions of the Human Genome Project have been slow in developing. On July 26, 2000 a press conference at the Whitehouse proclaimed the success of the Human Genome Project. However, at that time even the most fundamental of information, such as the number of human genes, remained unknown. While gene therapy has fallen short of its initial promises, personal medicine (the term will be used interchangeably with pharmacogenomics) is more promising. The development of hundreds of thousands of biomarkers along with the tech- nologies to rapidly and inexpensively perform genetic screening has created the foundation for personal medicine. Just as the Human Genome Project itself has been burdened with ethical implications, so has personal medicine. However, soci- ety has been evolving practices regarding genetic and clinical information which are poised for their application to per- sonal medicine. Here three areas with ethical implications: (1) privacy concerns, (2) economic considerations, and (3) po- tential malpractice litigation are discussed along with the application of pre-existing ethical principles to each.","PeriodicalId":352758,"journal":{"name":"The Open Ethics Journal","volume":"12 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-11-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Open Ethics Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/1874761200802010029","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The Human Genome Project was created with the ultimate goal of improving human health. Since its inception, the majority of funding has gone to the development of technologies and the creation of massive data sets. The applica- tions of the Human Genome Project have been slow in developing. On July 26, 2000 a press conference at the Whitehouse proclaimed the success of the Human Genome Project. However, at that time even the most fundamental of information, such as the number of human genes, remained unknown. While gene therapy has fallen short of its initial promises, personal medicine (the term will be used interchangeably with pharmacogenomics) is more promising. The development of hundreds of thousands of biomarkers along with the tech- nologies to rapidly and inexpensively perform genetic screening has created the foundation for personal medicine. Just as the Human Genome Project itself has been burdened with ethical implications, so has personal medicine. However, soci- ety has been evolving practices regarding genetic and clinical information which are poised for their application to per- sonal medicine. Here three areas with ethical implications: (1) privacy concerns, (2) economic considerations, and (3) po- tential malpractice litigation are discussed along with the application of pre-existing ethical principles to each.
现行伦理原则及其在个人医学中的应用
人类基因组计划的最终目标是改善人类健康。自成立以来,大部分资金都用于技术开发和大量数据集的创建。人类基因组计划的应用进展缓慢。2000年7月26日,白宫召开新闻发布会,宣布人类基因组计划取得成功。然而,在那个时候,即使是最基本的信息,如人类基因的数量,仍然是未知的。虽然基因疗法没有达到最初的承诺,但个人医学(该术语将与药物基因组学交替使用)更有希望。成千上万的生物标记物的发展,以及快速、廉价地进行基因筛查的技术,为个人医学奠定了基础。就像人类基因组计划本身背负着伦理影响一样,个人医疗也是如此。然而,社会一直在发展有关遗传和临床信息的实践,这些信息已准备好应用于个人医学。这里有三个具有道德含义的领域:(1)隐私问题,(2)经济考虑,(3)潜在的医疗事故诉讼,以及对每个领域预先存在的道德原则的应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信