The Use of Free Play in Preschools: An Analysis of the Impact of Stakeholder Perceptions

Dube Lekani
{"title":"The Use of Free Play in Preschools: An Analysis of the Impact of Stakeholder Perceptions","authors":"Dube Lekani","doi":"10.15580/GJSS.2013.9.102113911","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In most parts of the world many early childhood practitioners recognise the importance of free play for children’s development and emphasize play in their classrooms. This study analysed the impact of stakeholder perceptions on the use of free play in 10 preschools attached to primary schools in Masvingo district of Zimbabwe. The methodology employed in the study was largely qualitative, using the observation, interview and document analysis as data collection methods. Study participants included an Education Officer, ten school administrators, twenty preschool teachers, and twenty parents. From a detailed analysis and discussion of results, several findings were drawn. There were inconsistencies and inadequacies in the manner in which free play was conceptualised by the different stakeholders. Teaching in preschools was largely formal and free play opportunities were limited in the preschool daily schedule. Preschools were insufficiently equipped in terms of play resources because stakeholders had a limited understanding of the benefits of free play to children’s development and learning. The study concluded that free play was not being sufficiently offered in preschool and this disadvantaged the children. Therefore, the study recommended that stakeholders recognise the value of free play and support the teachers in its implementation.","PeriodicalId":145745,"journal":{"name":"Greener Journal of Social Sciences","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-11-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Greener Journal of Social Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15580/GJSS.2013.9.102113911","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In most parts of the world many early childhood practitioners recognise the importance of free play for children’s development and emphasize play in their classrooms. This study analysed the impact of stakeholder perceptions on the use of free play in 10 preschools attached to primary schools in Masvingo district of Zimbabwe. The methodology employed in the study was largely qualitative, using the observation, interview and document analysis as data collection methods. Study participants included an Education Officer, ten school administrators, twenty preschool teachers, and twenty parents. From a detailed analysis and discussion of results, several findings were drawn. There were inconsistencies and inadequacies in the manner in which free play was conceptualised by the different stakeholders. Teaching in preschools was largely formal and free play opportunities were limited in the preschool daily schedule. Preschools were insufficiently equipped in terms of play resources because stakeholders had a limited understanding of the benefits of free play to children’s development and learning. The study concluded that free play was not being sufficiently offered in preschool and this disadvantaged the children. Therefore, the study recommended that stakeholders recognise the value of free play and support the teachers in its implementation.
学龄前儿童自由游戏的使用:利益相关者认知的影响分析
在世界上大多数地区,许多幼儿教育工作者认识到自由玩耍对儿童发展的重要性,并强调在课堂上玩耍。本研究分析了利益相关者对津巴布韦马斯温戈地区10所小学附属幼儿园使用自由游戏的看法的影响。本研究采用的方法主要是定性的,采用观察法、访谈法和文献分析法作为数据收集方法。研究对象包括一名教育官员、十名学校管理人员、二十名幼教教师和二十名家长。通过对结果的详细分析和讨论,得出了几点结论。不同利益相关者对自由游戏概念的理解方式存在不一致和不足之处。学前班的教学基本上是正式的,自由玩耍的机会在学前班的日常安排中是有限的。幼儿园在游戏资源方面装备不足,因为利益相关者对自由游戏对儿童发展和学习的好处了解有限。研究得出的结论是,幼儿园没有提供足够的自由游戏,这对孩子们不利。因此,研究建议利益相关者认识到自由游戏的价值,并支持教师实施自由游戏。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信