Middle-latency somatosensory evoked potentials after stimulation of the radial and median nerves: component structure and scalp topography.

R. Treede, V. Kunde
{"title":"Middle-latency somatosensory evoked potentials after stimulation of the radial and median nerves: component structure and scalp topography.","authors":"R. Treede, V. Kunde","doi":"10.1097/00004691-199505010-00007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs) after radial nerve stimulation are studied less frequently than those after median nerve stimulation. Therefore, little is known about their component structure and scalp topography. We investigated radial nerve SEPs after electrical stimulation at the left wrist. For comparison, the median nerve was also stimulated at the wrist. SEPs were recorded with 15 scalp electrodes (bandpass 0.5-200 Hz) in 27 healthy subjects. The waveform of the radial nerve SEP at a contralateral parietal lead was comparable to that of the median nerve SEP, consisting of P14, N20, P30, and N60. In spite of comparable stimulus intensities, SEP amplitudes were smaller after radial than after median nerve stimulation. Significant latency differences were found only for N20 (earlier for median nerve) and P30 (earlier for radial nerve). The duration of the primary complex N20-P30 thus was significantly shorter for the radial nerve. Whereas N20 and P30 were present with either earlobe or frontal reference, N60 had a prerolandic maximum and was best recorded with a bipolar transverse derivation. In addition, another middle-latency negativity (N110) was found near the secondary somatosensory cortex, which had previously been described only for radial nerve stimulation. In standard SEP derivations, the N110 is riding on the ascending limb of the vertex negativity. It could best be recorded in low temporal leads versus a midline reference. The scalp topographies of P30, N60, and N110 were similar for radial and median nerve stimulation.","PeriodicalId":117726,"journal":{"name":"Journal of clinical neurophysiology : official publication of the American Electroencephalographic Society","volume":"112 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1995-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"28","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of clinical neurophysiology : official publication of the American Electroencephalographic Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/00004691-199505010-00007","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 28

Abstract

Somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs) after radial nerve stimulation are studied less frequently than those after median nerve stimulation. Therefore, little is known about their component structure and scalp topography. We investigated radial nerve SEPs after electrical stimulation at the left wrist. For comparison, the median nerve was also stimulated at the wrist. SEPs were recorded with 15 scalp electrodes (bandpass 0.5-200 Hz) in 27 healthy subjects. The waveform of the radial nerve SEP at a contralateral parietal lead was comparable to that of the median nerve SEP, consisting of P14, N20, P30, and N60. In spite of comparable stimulus intensities, SEP amplitudes were smaller after radial than after median nerve stimulation. Significant latency differences were found only for N20 (earlier for median nerve) and P30 (earlier for radial nerve). The duration of the primary complex N20-P30 thus was significantly shorter for the radial nerve. Whereas N20 and P30 were present with either earlobe or frontal reference, N60 had a prerolandic maximum and was best recorded with a bipolar transverse derivation. In addition, another middle-latency negativity (N110) was found near the secondary somatosensory cortex, which had previously been described only for radial nerve stimulation. In standard SEP derivations, the N110 is riding on the ascending limb of the vertex negativity. It could best be recorded in low temporal leads versus a midline reference. The scalp topographies of P30, N60, and N110 were similar for radial and median nerve stimulation.
放射神经和正中神经刺激后的中潜伏期体感诱发电位:成分结构和头皮地形。
与正中神经刺激相比,桡神经刺激后的体感诱发电位(SEPs)研究较少。因此,人们对它们的组成结构和头皮形貌知之甚少。我们研究了左手腕电刺激后桡神经的sep。相比之下,手腕处的正中神经也受到了刺激。用15个头皮电极(带通0.5 ~ 200 Hz)记录27例健康受试者的脑电图。桡神经在对侧顶骨导联处的SEP波形与正中神经SEP相当,包括P14、N20、P30和N60。尽管刺激强度相当,但桡神经刺激后的SEP振幅小于正中神经刺激后的SEP振幅。只有N20(正中神经较早)和P30(桡神经较早)的潜伏期存在显著差异。因此,桡神经的初级复合体N20-P30的持续时间明显较短。而N20和P30在耳垂或额部参考中都存在,N60具有前倾最大值,并且在双极横向衍生中记录最好。此外,在次级体感皮层附近发现了另一种中潜伏期负性(N110),这种负性以前只在桡神经刺激中被描述过。在标准的SEP推导中,N110位于顶点负的上升分支上。相对于中线参考,低时间导联可以更好地记录。在桡神经和正中神经刺激下,P30、N60和N110的头皮地形相似。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信