Hearing in Infancy: The Development of Auditory Skills and the Audiological Evaluation

J. Marlowe
{"title":"Hearing in Infancy: The Development of Auditory Skills and the Audiological Evaluation","authors":"J. Marlowe","doi":"10.1055/s-0028-1094173","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Among the most dramatic advances in the field of audiology has been the evolution of special testing techniques aimed at the infant from 0 to 24 months. Amid the urgings for early identification voiced by researchers and developmental experts (Mencher, 1977; White, 1975), there has emerged a ready supply of theoretical information and proven methods to accurately identify hearing loss close to birth. A survey of actual clinical practices, however, may reveal a discouraging gap between available knowledge and its application. Much time and effort may be expended in the evaluation of children eighteen months and older, yet the younger infant may receive only cursory and reserved attention (Simmons, 1980). Perhaps even we audiologists have fallen victim to the myth that evaluating babies is time-consuming, expensive, extraordinarily difficult, and fraught with uncertainty. Nothing could be further from the truth! While there are many areas of research as yet unexplored, we do possess sufficient developmental information and appropriate measurement techniques to identify hearing loss even in newborns. Beyond these basics, the clinician must be equipped with a sense of commitment and self-confidence which may be cultivated by study and practice. Thus, it would seem appropriate in any discussion of audiological evaluation to begin by reviewing some of the pertinent developmental data which lend validity to the assessment tools available and reveal the expected response. Strategies for successfully employing these techniques will be included, in the hope that it will become patent that prompt infant identification is not only desirable but imperative. The audiologist is in a unique position not only to perform the evaluation but to spearhead the effort to discover affected babies.","PeriodicalId":364385,"journal":{"name":"Seminars in Speech, Language and Hearing","volume":"15 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1982-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"10","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Seminars in Speech, Language and Hearing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0028-1094173","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

Abstract

Among the most dramatic advances in the field of audiology has been the evolution of special testing techniques aimed at the infant from 0 to 24 months. Amid the urgings for early identification voiced by researchers and developmental experts (Mencher, 1977; White, 1975), there has emerged a ready supply of theoretical information and proven methods to accurately identify hearing loss close to birth. A survey of actual clinical practices, however, may reveal a discouraging gap between available knowledge and its application. Much time and effort may be expended in the evaluation of children eighteen months and older, yet the younger infant may receive only cursory and reserved attention (Simmons, 1980). Perhaps even we audiologists have fallen victim to the myth that evaluating babies is time-consuming, expensive, extraordinarily difficult, and fraught with uncertainty. Nothing could be further from the truth! While there are many areas of research as yet unexplored, we do possess sufficient developmental information and appropriate measurement techniques to identify hearing loss even in newborns. Beyond these basics, the clinician must be equipped with a sense of commitment and self-confidence which may be cultivated by study and practice. Thus, it would seem appropriate in any discussion of audiological evaluation to begin by reviewing some of the pertinent developmental data which lend validity to the assessment tools available and reveal the expected response. Strategies for successfully employing these techniques will be included, in the hope that it will become patent that prompt infant identification is not only desirable but imperative. The audiologist is in a unique position not only to perform the evaluation but to spearhead the effort to discover affected babies.
婴儿期听力:听觉技能的发展和听力学评价
听力学领域最引人注目的进步之一是针对0至24个月婴儿的特殊测试技术的发展。在研究人员和发展专家呼吁早期识别的呼声中(Mencher, 1977;White, 1975),已经出现了现成的理论信息和经过验证的方法来准确识别接近出生的听力损失。然而,对实际临床实践的调查可能会揭示现有知识与其应用之间令人沮丧的差距。在对18个月及以上的儿童进行评估时,可能会花费大量的时间和精力,而年幼的婴儿可能只会得到粗略和保留的关注(Simmons, 1980)。也许就连我们这些听力学家也成了这样一个神话的受害者:对婴儿进行评估既耗时又昂贵,极其困难,而且充满了不确定性。事实远非如此!虽然还有许多研究领域尚未探索,但我们确实拥有足够的发育信息和适当的测量技术来识别新生儿的听力损失。除了这些基础之外,临床医生还必须具备通过学习和实践培养的责任感和自信心。因此,在任何关于听力学评估的讨论中,似乎都应该首先回顾一些相关的发展数据,这些数据为现有的评估工具提供了有效性,并揭示了预期的反应。将包括成功使用这些技术的策略,希望迅速识别婴儿不仅是可取的,而且是必要的,这将成为专利。听力学家处于一个独特的位置,不仅要进行评估,而且要带头努力发现受影响的婴儿。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信