SAFE: A Simple Approach for Feature Extraction from App Descriptions and App Reviews

Timo Johann, Christoph Stanik, B. AlirezaM.Alizadeh, W. Maalej
{"title":"SAFE: A Simple Approach for Feature Extraction from App Descriptions and App Reviews","authors":"Timo Johann, Christoph Stanik, B. AlirezaM.Alizadeh, W. Maalej","doi":"10.1109/RE.2017.71","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A main advantage of app stores is that they aggregate important information created by both developers and users. In the app store product pages, developers usually describe and maintain the features of their apps. In the app reviews, users comment these features. Recent studies focused on mining app features either as described by developers or as reviewed by users. However, extracting and matching the features from the app descriptions and the reviews is essential to bear the app store advantages, e.g. allowing analysts to identify which app features are actually being reviewed and which are not. In this paper, we propose SAFE, a novel uniform approach to extract app features from the single app pages, the single reviews and to match them. We manually build 18 part-of-speech patterns and 5 sentence patterns that are frequently used in text referring to app features. We then apply these patterns with several text pre-and post-processing steps. A major advantage of our approach is that it does not require large training and configuration data. To evaluate its accuracy, we manually extracted the features mentioned in the pages and reviews of 10 apps. The extraction precision and recall outperformed two state-of-the-art approaches. For well-maintained app pages such as for Google Drive our approach has a precision of 87% and on average 56% for 10 evaluated apps. SAFE also matches 87% of the features extracted from user reviews to those extracted from the app descriptions.","PeriodicalId":176958,"journal":{"name":"2017 IEEE 25th International Requirements Engineering Conference (RE)","volume":"11 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"122","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2017 IEEE 25th International Requirements Engineering Conference (RE)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/RE.2017.71","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 122

Abstract

A main advantage of app stores is that they aggregate important information created by both developers and users. In the app store product pages, developers usually describe and maintain the features of their apps. In the app reviews, users comment these features. Recent studies focused on mining app features either as described by developers or as reviewed by users. However, extracting and matching the features from the app descriptions and the reviews is essential to bear the app store advantages, e.g. allowing analysts to identify which app features are actually being reviewed and which are not. In this paper, we propose SAFE, a novel uniform approach to extract app features from the single app pages, the single reviews and to match them. We manually build 18 part-of-speech patterns and 5 sentence patterns that are frequently used in text referring to app features. We then apply these patterns with several text pre-and post-processing steps. A major advantage of our approach is that it does not require large training and configuration data. To evaluate its accuracy, we manually extracted the features mentioned in the pages and reviews of 10 apps. The extraction precision and recall outperformed two state-of-the-art approaches. For well-maintained app pages such as for Google Drive our approach has a precision of 87% and on average 56% for 10 evaluated apps. SAFE also matches 87% of the features extracted from user reviews to those extracted from the app descriptions.
SAFE:从应用描述和应用评论中提取特征的简单方法
应用商店的一个主要优势是,它们汇集了开发者和用户创造的重要信息。在应用商店产品页面中,开发者通常会描述和维护应用的功能。在应用评论中,用户会对这些功能进行评论。最近的研究集中在挖掘应用程序的功能,要么是开发者描述的,要么是用户评论的。然而,从应用描述和评论中提取和匹配功能对于应用商店的优势是必不可少的,例如,允许分析师识别哪些应用功能实际上被审查了,哪些没有。在本文中,我们提出了SAFE,这是一种新颖的统一方法,用于从单个应用程序页面,单个评论中提取应用程序特征并进行匹配。我们手动构建了18个词性模式和5个句子模式,这些模式在参考应用程序功能的文本中经常使用。然后,我们通过几个文本预处理和后处理步骤应用这些模式。我们的方法的一个主要优点是它不需要大量的训练和配置数据。为了评估其准确性,我们手动提取了10个应用的页面和评论中提到的功能。提取精度和召回率优于两种最先进的方法。对于谷歌Drive等维护良好的应用页面,我们的方法的准确率为87%,10个评估应用的平均准确率为56%。SAFE还将从用户评论中提取的87%的功能与从应用描述中提取的功能相匹配。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信