The European Deposit Guarantee Directive: An Appraisal of the Reforms

Dalvinder Singh, David K. Walker
{"title":"The European Deposit Guarantee Directive: An Appraisal of the Reforms","authors":"Dalvinder Singh, David K. Walker","doi":"10.4324/9781003122876-10","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The international financial crisis of 2007 and 2008 exposed some crucial deficiencies in the European deposit protection arrangements as set out in the 1994 Directive. The recent financial turmoil once again highlighted the importance of deposit protection to contribute to financial stability and reduce the risk of depositor panic as banks experience problems. The crisis concomitantly exposed the cross-border risks in the EU’s integrated financial marketplace.This chapter explores the rationale behind deposit protection to safeguard financial stability and protect depositors. It will review the introduction of deposit protection in the EU and particularly explore the limits of its ‘model’ in light of the wider literature on deposit protection. The reform to the 1994 Directive was introduced in March 2009. 1 The principal conclusion is while the 2009 reforms have abolished co-insurance, increased the coverage level and reduced the delay in reimbursements, they have not dealt with some of the underlying issues that underpin the efficiency with which these reforms can ultimately be satisfied, namely how the Member states will formally fund their deposit protection schemes to meet any proposed payout. Moreover, the lack of consideration of this means Member states will still need to intervene in future crises to bridge the gap.","PeriodicalId":241446,"journal":{"name":"PSN: Response to Financial Crisis (Comparative - Monetary) (Topic)","volume":"10 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PSN: Response to Financial Crisis (Comparative - Monetary) (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003122876-10","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

The international financial crisis of 2007 and 2008 exposed some crucial deficiencies in the European deposit protection arrangements as set out in the 1994 Directive. The recent financial turmoil once again highlighted the importance of deposit protection to contribute to financial stability and reduce the risk of depositor panic as banks experience problems. The crisis concomitantly exposed the cross-border risks in the EU’s integrated financial marketplace.This chapter explores the rationale behind deposit protection to safeguard financial stability and protect depositors. It will review the introduction of deposit protection in the EU and particularly explore the limits of its ‘model’ in light of the wider literature on deposit protection. The reform to the 1994 Directive was introduced in March 2009. 1 The principal conclusion is while the 2009 reforms have abolished co-insurance, increased the coverage level and reduced the delay in reimbursements, they have not dealt with some of the underlying issues that underpin the efficiency with which these reforms can ultimately be satisfied, namely how the Member states will formally fund their deposit protection schemes to meet any proposed payout. Moreover, the lack of consideration of this means Member states will still need to intervene in future crises to bridge the gap.
欧洲存款担保指令:改革评估
2007年和2008年的国际金融危机暴露了1994年指令中规定的欧洲存款保护安排的一些重大缺陷。最近的金融动荡再次凸显了存款保护的重要性,它有助于金融稳定,并在银行遇到问题时降低储户恐慌的风险。这场危机同时暴露了欧盟一体化金融市场的跨境风险。本章探讨存款保障的基本原理,以维护金融稳定和保护存款人。它将审查引入存款保护在欧盟,特别是探索其“模式”的限制,在更广泛的文献存款保护的光。对1994年指令的改革于2009年3月开始实施。主要结论是,虽然2009年的改革取消了共同保险,增加了覆盖范围,减少了报销延迟,但它们没有处理一些基础问题,这些问题支撑着这些改革最终能够得到满足的效率,即成员国将如何正式资助其存款保护计划以满足任何拟议的支付。此外,缺乏对这一点的考虑意味着会员国仍将需要在未来的危机中进行干预,以弥合差距。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信