M. Valera Rubio, MI Sierra-Torres, R. Castillejo-García, J. Cordero-Ramos, JF Álvarez-Zarallo, M. Calleja‐Hernández
{"title":"5PSQ-002 Adverse events reported after administration of BNT162B2 and mRNA-1273 COVID-19 vaccines among healthcare workers","authors":"M. Valera Rubio, MI Sierra-Torres, R. Castillejo-García, J. Cordero-Ramos, JF Álvarez-Zarallo, M. Calleja‐Hernández","doi":"10.1136/ejhpharm-2022-eahp.417","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background and importanceSince December 2019, the world has faced a new disease known as COVID-19. On 11 March 2020, the World Health Organization officially declared the COVID-19 pandemic. Given the health emergency, vaccine development progressed rapidly, but with limited safety data under real-world conditions.Aim and objectivesTo describe and compare the incidence of adverse events with the BNT162b2 and mRNA-1273 COVID-19 vaccines, taking into account the number of doses and subjects previously positive for SARS-CoV-2 infection.Material and methodsA retrospective observational study was conducted in a tertiary hospital between March and April 2021. Data were collected through a questionnaire sent by email to hospital staff. Demographics and data regarding the occurrence of adverse events were collected, indicating which vaccine was administered. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS software. Groups were compared using the Chi-square test and Fisher’s exact test when necessary.Results1249 respondents completed the survey (25% of all hospital staff);52% (650) received BNT162b2 vaccine and 48% (599) mRNA-1273. 14 402 adverse reactions were recorded. 6896 were local: 3939 were with mRNA-1273 and 2957 with BNT162b2 (6.6 vs 4.4 reactions per patient);and 7506 were systemic: 4460 with mRNA-1273 and 3046 with BNT162b2 (7.4 vs 4.7 per patient). The occurrence of local reactions was 95.8% after the first dose/89.1% after the second dose with mRNA-1273 versus 89.7%/82.5% with BNT162b2. For systemic reactions, this proportion was 64.3%/93.3% versu 46.8%/73.2% (p value<0.05).In terms of severity, 379 patients (63.3%) with mRNA-1273 confirmed a severe reaction versus 222 (34.2%) with BNT162b2 and 60 patients (10%) with mRNA-1273 confirmed an urgent reaction versus 33 (5.1%) with BNT162b2 (p value<0.001). For both vaccines, there was no difference in the occurrence of local or systemic reactions between patients seropositive and seronegative for SARS-CoV-2.Conclusion and relevanceThe results are consistent with the limited data available to date, confirming that although these are not particularly serious adverse effects, they do occur in a large majority of vaccinated persons and in greater numbers after administration of the mRNA-1273 vaccine. The Hospital Pharmacy Service is a key agent in pharmacovigilance within the healthcare system and must be aware of the safety profile of new drugs. This study is an essential tool to detect and prevent adverse events.References and/or acknowledgementsConflict of interestNo conflict of interest","PeriodicalId":393937,"journal":{"name":"Section 7: Post Congress additions","volume":"16 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Section 7: Post Congress additions","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/ejhpharm-2022-eahp.417","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background and importanceSince December 2019, the world has faced a new disease known as COVID-19. On 11 March 2020, the World Health Organization officially declared the COVID-19 pandemic. Given the health emergency, vaccine development progressed rapidly, but with limited safety data under real-world conditions.Aim and objectivesTo describe and compare the incidence of adverse events with the BNT162b2 and mRNA-1273 COVID-19 vaccines, taking into account the number of doses and subjects previously positive for SARS-CoV-2 infection.Material and methodsA retrospective observational study was conducted in a tertiary hospital between March and April 2021. Data were collected through a questionnaire sent by email to hospital staff. Demographics and data regarding the occurrence of adverse events were collected, indicating which vaccine was administered. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS software. Groups were compared using the Chi-square test and Fisher’s exact test when necessary.Results1249 respondents completed the survey (25% of all hospital staff);52% (650) received BNT162b2 vaccine and 48% (599) mRNA-1273. 14 402 adverse reactions were recorded. 6896 were local: 3939 were with mRNA-1273 and 2957 with BNT162b2 (6.6 vs 4.4 reactions per patient);and 7506 were systemic: 4460 with mRNA-1273 and 3046 with BNT162b2 (7.4 vs 4.7 per patient). The occurrence of local reactions was 95.8% after the first dose/89.1% after the second dose with mRNA-1273 versus 89.7%/82.5% with BNT162b2. For systemic reactions, this proportion was 64.3%/93.3% versu 46.8%/73.2% (p value<0.05).In terms of severity, 379 patients (63.3%) with mRNA-1273 confirmed a severe reaction versus 222 (34.2%) with BNT162b2 and 60 patients (10%) with mRNA-1273 confirmed an urgent reaction versus 33 (5.1%) with BNT162b2 (p value<0.001). For both vaccines, there was no difference in the occurrence of local or systemic reactions between patients seropositive and seronegative for SARS-CoV-2.Conclusion and relevanceThe results are consistent with the limited data available to date, confirming that although these are not particularly serious adverse effects, they do occur in a large majority of vaccinated persons and in greater numbers after administration of the mRNA-1273 vaccine. The Hospital Pharmacy Service is a key agent in pharmacovigilance within the healthcare system and must be aware of the safety profile of new drugs. This study is an essential tool to detect and prevent adverse events.References and/or acknowledgementsConflict of interestNo conflict of interest
自2019年12月以来,世界面临着一种名为COVID-19的新疾病。2020年3月11日,世界卫生组织正式宣布COVID-19大流行。鉴于卫生紧急情况,疫苗开发进展迅速,但在现实条件下的安全性数据有限。目的和目的描述和比较BNT162b2和mRNA-1273 COVID-19疫苗的不良事件发生率,同时考虑到先前SARS-CoV-2感染阳性的剂量和受试者数量。材料与方法回顾性观察研究于2021年3月至4月在某三级医院进行。通过电子邮件向医院工作人员发送问卷收集数据。收集了有关不良事件发生的人口统计数据和数据,表明接种了哪种疫苗。采用SPSS软件进行统计分析。组间比较采用卡方检验,必要时采用Fisher精确检验。结果1249名应答者(25%)完成了调查,52%(650人)接种了BNT162b2疫苗,48%(599人)接种了mRNA-1273疫苗。记录不良反应14402例。6896例为局部反应,3939例为mRNA-1273反应,2957例为BNT162b2反应(6.6 vs 4.4 /例);7506例为全身反应,4460例为mRNA-1273反应,3046例为BNT162b2反应(7.4 vs 4.7 /例)。mRNA-1273第一次给药后局部反应发生率为95.8% /89.1%,而BNT162b2给药后局部反应发生率为89.7%/82.5%。对于全身反应,这一比例分别为64.3%/93.3%和46.8%/73.2% (p值<0.05)。在严重程度方面,mRNA-1273组379例(63.3%)确诊为严重反应,而BNT162b2组222例(34.2%);mRNA-1273组60例(10%)确诊为紧急反应,而BNT162b2组33例(5.1%)(p值<0.001)。对于这两种疫苗,SARS-CoV-2血清阳性和血清阴性患者的局部或全身反应发生率无差异。结论和相关性研究结果与迄今为止有限的可用数据一致,证实尽管这些不是特别严重的不良反应,但它们确实发生在绝大多数接种了mRNA-1273疫苗的人身上,并且在接种了mRNA-1273疫苗后发生率更高。医院药房服务是医疗保健系统中药物警戒的关键代理人,必须了解新药的安全性。这项研究是发现和预防不良事件的重要工具。参考文献和/或致谢利益冲突无利益冲突