Applicable Law to Insurance Contracts in the light Of Rome I Regulation – Challenges to Cross-Border Insurance Contracts in the EU

Pedro Monteiro de Meireles
{"title":"Applicable Law to Insurance Contracts in the light Of Rome I Regulation – Challenges to Cross-Border Insurance Contracts in the EU","authors":"Pedro Monteiro de Meireles","doi":"10.46294/ulplr13n1d5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article explores the current situation of cross-border insurance contracts within the EU. \nIn contracts that do not involve a conflict of laws, the determination of the applicable law is hastily and of a relatively easy resolution, as they will be disciplined by the substantive law of the current legal order, which they only have contact with. When it comes to insurance contracts that are seen in a conflict of laws, defining the applicable law raises a question since these contracts are in contact with at least more than one legal order. In this case, there is a certain amount of uncertainty regarding which judicial order will govern the contract and the criteria that will dictate this resolution. \nWhen we refer to an insurance contract that involves a conflict of several laws, such as a policyholder with regular residence in MS A, who contracts an insurance contract with an insurer based in MS B, whose risk is in MS C. Due to this, there are several points of contact with different legal orders. As such, it will be necessary to establish what the contract's regulatory law should be. \nIn the EU domain, the answer to this issue is to reflect on the regulations defining the applicable law. In this context, we highlight the Rome I Regulation, which establishes in its article 7 a special conflict rule, hence appearing as the starting point for the problem raised by us. This way, we will focus on the analysis of the solutions contained in article 7, related to large risk contracts and contracts covering mass risks whose unpredictability is located within the EU. \nFinally, we will explore legal solutions to establish an applicable law in association with the principle of free movement. In particular, as seen in a classic case of an active insurance seeking, where the policyholder, in the light of his freedom of movement, decides on his own to hire insurance from another legal system, apart from his home state.","PeriodicalId":378371,"journal":{"name":"ULP Law Review","volume":"14 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ULP Law Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46294/ulplr13n1d5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article explores the current situation of cross-border insurance contracts within the EU. In contracts that do not involve a conflict of laws, the determination of the applicable law is hastily and of a relatively easy resolution, as they will be disciplined by the substantive law of the current legal order, which they only have contact with. When it comes to insurance contracts that are seen in a conflict of laws, defining the applicable law raises a question since these contracts are in contact with at least more than one legal order. In this case, there is a certain amount of uncertainty regarding which judicial order will govern the contract and the criteria that will dictate this resolution. When we refer to an insurance contract that involves a conflict of several laws, such as a policyholder with regular residence in MS A, who contracts an insurance contract with an insurer based in MS B, whose risk is in MS C. Due to this, there are several points of contact with different legal orders. As such, it will be necessary to establish what the contract's regulatory law should be. In the EU domain, the answer to this issue is to reflect on the regulations defining the applicable law. In this context, we highlight the Rome I Regulation, which establishes in its article 7 a special conflict rule, hence appearing as the starting point for the problem raised by us. This way, we will focus on the analysis of the solutions contained in article 7, related to large risk contracts and contracts covering mass risks whose unpredictability is located within the EU. Finally, we will explore legal solutions to establish an applicable law in association with the principle of free movement. In particular, as seen in a classic case of an active insurance seeking, where the policyholder, in the light of his freedom of movement, decides on his own to hire insurance from another legal system, apart from his home state.
《罗马一号条例》下保险合同的适用法律-欧盟跨境保险合同面临的挑战
本文探讨了欧盟内部跨境保险合同的现状。在不涉及法律冲突的合同中,确定适用法律是匆忙的,而且相对容易解决,因为他们将受到当前法律秩序的实体法的约束,而他们只与之接触。当涉及到在法律冲突中看到的保险合同时,定义适用法律会引起一个问题,因为这些合同至少与一个以上的法律秩序有联系。在这种情况下,对于哪种司法命令将管辖合同以及决定这一决议的标准存在一定程度的不确定性。当我们提到涉及几个法律冲突的保险合同时,例如在MS a经常居住的投保人与MS B的保险公司签订保险合同,其风险在MS c。因此,有几个与不同法律秩序的联系点。因此,有必要确定合同的监管法律应该是什么。在欧盟领域,解决这个问题的答案是反思界定适用法律的法规。在这方面,我们强调《罗马一号规则》,该规则在其第7条中规定了一项特殊的冲突规则,因此似乎是我们提出的问题的起点。这样,我们将重点分析第7条中包含的解决方案,这些解决方案与欧盟内部不可预测性的大型风险合同和涵盖大规模风险的合同有关。最后,我们将探讨法律解决方案,以建立与自由流动原则相关的适用法律。特别是,正如在一个典型的主动寻求保险的案例中所看到的那样,在这个案例中,投保人根据他的行动自由,自己决定从他所在州以外的另一个法律体系中雇用保险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信