Error Probability of CDMA in the Poisson Channel

D. Brady, S. Verdú
{"title":"Error Probability of CDMA in the Poisson Channel","authors":"D. Brady, S. Verdú","doi":"10.1109/ITW.1989.761414","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Recent work in the analysis of noncoherent, optical Code Division Multiple Access (CDMA) receivers has relied on the approximations of Gaussian-distributed Multiple Access Interference (MAI). cooperation among the users for chip synchronization, or direct observation of the optical intensity (also known as perfect-optical-to-electrical conversion). Until now.the accuracy of these approximations has not been addressed. In this work we derive the exact error expression for the noncoherent, optical matched-filter receiver based on the electron count in a symbol period. The analysis is valid for arbitrary quantum efficiencies and dark currents, and employs the semi-classical model of light. We do not assume perfect optical-to-electrical conversion, Gaussian-distributed MAI, or synchronism among the users. We then compare the exact error rate to those obtained from popular approximations. Using the prime codes as an example, we show that the assumption of perfect optical-to-electrical conversion, which leads to the \"error-free\" hypothesis test for a suitably small user group size, is a poor model for the photodetection process at moderate incident optical intensities and dark currents. We show that the combined assumptions of perfect optical-to-electrical conversion and Gaussian-distributed MA1 yield an overestimate of the optimal threshold and an underestimate of the error rate for small but reasonable optical powers. The error rate expression that we derive is valid for arbitrary, i.i.d. relative delays among the users. The error rate expression is considerably simplified when the delay distribution corresponding to chip-synchronism is used. We take advantage of this fact to derive upper and lower bounds on the asynchronous error rate by using the chip-synchronous expression. The tightness of these bounds for various optical energies and signature sequence sets is discussed.","PeriodicalId":413028,"journal":{"name":"IEEE/CAM Information Theory Workshop at Cornell","volume":"70 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1989-06-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE/CAM Information Theory Workshop at Cornell","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ITW.1989.761414","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Recent work in the analysis of noncoherent, optical Code Division Multiple Access (CDMA) receivers has relied on the approximations of Gaussian-distributed Multiple Access Interference (MAI). cooperation among the users for chip synchronization, or direct observation of the optical intensity (also known as perfect-optical-to-electrical conversion). Until now.the accuracy of these approximations has not been addressed. In this work we derive the exact error expression for the noncoherent, optical matched-filter receiver based on the electron count in a symbol period. The analysis is valid for arbitrary quantum efficiencies and dark currents, and employs the semi-classical model of light. We do not assume perfect optical-to-electrical conversion, Gaussian-distributed MAI, or synchronism among the users. We then compare the exact error rate to those obtained from popular approximations. Using the prime codes as an example, we show that the assumption of perfect optical-to-electrical conversion, which leads to the "error-free" hypothesis test for a suitably small user group size, is a poor model for the photodetection process at moderate incident optical intensities and dark currents. We show that the combined assumptions of perfect optical-to-electrical conversion and Gaussian-distributed MA1 yield an overestimate of the optimal threshold and an underestimate of the error rate for small but reasonable optical powers. The error rate expression that we derive is valid for arbitrary, i.i.d. relative delays among the users. The error rate expression is considerably simplified when the delay distribution corresponding to chip-synchronism is used. We take advantage of this fact to derive upper and lower bounds on the asynchronous error rate by using the chip-synchronous expression. The tightness of these bounds for various optical energies and signature sequence sets is discussed.
码分多址在泊松信道中的错误概率
最近对非相干光码分多址(CDMA)接收机的分析工作依赖于高斯分布多址干扰(MAI)的近似。用户之间合作进行芯片同步,或直接观察光强(也称为完美光电转换)。直到现在。这些近似的准确性尚未得到解决。本文推导了基于符号周期内电子计数的非相干光学匹配滤波接收机的精确误差表达式。该分析适用于任意量子效率和暗电流,并采用光的半经典模型。我们不假设完美的光-电转换,高斯分布MAI,或用户之间的同步。然后,我们将准确的错误率与从流行的近似值中获得的错误率进行比较。以素数码为例,我们表明,完美的光-电转换假设导致了适当小的用户群规模的“无误差”假设检验,对于中等入射光强和暗电流下的光探测过程来说,这是一个糟糕的模型。我们表明,完美的光电转换和高斯分布MA1的组合假设产生了对最佳阈值的高估和对小但合理的光功率误差率的低估。我们推导的错误率表达式对任意用户之间的相对延迟都有效。当采用与芯片同步相对应的延迟分布时,错误率表达式得到了极大的简化。我们利用这一事实,利用芯片同步表达式推导出异步错误率的上下界。讨论了这些边界对各种光学能量和特征序列集的紧密性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信