The Symbolic Representation of Evil and Good in William Golding’s Lord of the Flies

Mahmoud A. Al.Sobh, Ameen Z. Al Khamaiseh, Samer M. Al-Zoubi
{"title":"The Symbolic Representation of Evil and Good in William Golding’s Lord of the Flies","authors":"Mahmoud A. Al.Sobh, Ameen Z. Al Khamaiseh, Samer M. Al-Zoubi","doi":"10.7575/aiac.ijalel.v.11n.1p.21","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This Study sheds a new light on William Golding’s view of evil and good in Lord of the Flies. For many writers, critics and theorists, evil is a societal construct, while good is an internal one. Both are structured by external factors. William Golding, however, believes that man has an inherent potential for evil and that it cannot by any means be a cultural product as has long been thought. Man’s potential for good, on the other hand, is dictated by law, common sense, culture and from the fact that man’s social engagement with others is inevitable. In Lord of the Flies, Golding seeks to give answers to the philosophical questions: Can man live a lone? Can there be a life in the absence of law and order? What would become of people should there be no society or civilization? Golding’s central argument centers on critiquing the inherent potential of man’s capacity for evil in the absence of law and order. In this study, there will be an examination of Golding’s pessimistic view of good and evil in light of the modern literary definition of these polarities.","PeriodicalId":341726,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Applied Linguistics and English Literature","volume":"126 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Applied Linguistics and English Literature","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.ijalel.v.11n.1p.21","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This Study sheds a new light on William Golding’s view of evil and good in Lord of the Flies. For many writers, critics and theorists, evil is a societal construct, while good is an internal one. Both are structured by external factors. William Golding, however, believes that man has an inherent potential for evil and that it cannot by any means be a cultural product as has long been thought. Man’s potential for good, on the other hand, is dictated by law, common sense, culture and from the fact that man’s social engagement with others is inevitable. In Lord of the Flies, Golding seeks to give answers to the philosophical questions: Can man live a lone? Can there be a life in the absence of law and order? What would become of people should there be no society or civilization? Golding’s central argument centers on critiquing the inherent potential of man’s capacity for evil in the absence of law and order. In this study, there will be an examination of Golding’s pessimistic view of good and evil in light of the modern literary definition of these polarities.
论威廉·戈尔丁《蝇王》中善与恶的象征表现
这项研究为威廉·戈尔丁在《蝇王》中的善恶观提供了新的视角。对于许多作家、评论家和理论家来说,恶是一种社会建构,而善是一种内在建构。两者都是由外部因素构成的。然而,威廉·戈尔丁认为,人类有一种内在的邪恶潜能,它绝不可能像长期以来所认为的那样是一种文化产物。另一方面,人类向善的潜力是由法律、常识、文化以及人类与他人的社会交往是不可避免的这一事实决定的。在《蝇王》中,戈尔丁试图回答一些哲学问题:人能孤独地生活吗?没有法律和秩序的生活还能存在吗?如果没有社会和文明,人类会变成什么样子?戈尔丁的核心论点集中在批评在缺乏法律和秩序的情况下人类邪恶能力的内在潜力。在本研究中,将根据现代文学对善恶两极的定义来考察戈尔丁对善恶的悲观看法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信