Thomas Killigrew and the Seventeenth-Century English Stage

Riki Miyoshi
{"title":"Thomas Killigrew and the Seventeenth-Century English Stage","authors":"Riki Miyoshi","doi":"10.4324/9781315551029","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Philip Major, ed. Thomas Killigrew and the Seventeenth-Century English Stage. Farnham: Ashgate Publishers, 2013. 236 pp. £60.00 (hardback); also available in ebook PDF. ISBN 9781409466680.As part of Ashgate's New Perspectives series, the book celebrates the quadricentenary of Thomas Killigrew's birth and re-examines the life and career of a man who, in the words of Philip Major, \"possessed a ceaseless love of life, boundless energy, dogged determination, attractive cosmopolitanism, and witty articulacy\" (2). This new study on the hitherto \"strangely elusive figure\" (1) is especially timely because of the staggering paucity of scholarship on Killigrew: Alfred Harbage wrote the last and only biography in 1930 and William T. Reich's edition of Claricilla in 1980 was the most recent publication of any of Killigrew's plays. The book, furthermore, comes out at a time when studies in royalism are becoming ever more popular and nuanced, rendering a new monograph on an influential royalist courtier such as Killigrew not only desirable but also essential. In this \"more receptive and propitious critical atmosphere\" (2) the eight contributors to the volume deal with different aspects of Killigrew's tumultuous life and his varied career. Over half a century on from Harbage's detailed study of Killigrew, this volume challenges the narrow one-dimensional characterization of Killigrew as a mere cavalier bon vivant and provides a newly complex and insightful portrayal of a man who was not a saint and was undoubtedly \"one of the most colourful characters of the mid-seventeenth century\" (1).In chapter 1, Eleanor Collins examines Thomas Killigrew's early plays of the 1630s when he was a Cockpit dramatist. During the period of \"the second war of the theatres,\" Queen Henrietta's Men at the Cockpit produced two plays by Killigrew: The Prisoners and Claracilla. Through a close reading of the plays Collins persuasively argues against the conventional view that these pieces were primarily meant by Killigrew as a means of ingratiating himself with the queen. In particular Collins convincingly suggests that Killigrew's treatment of the theme of platonic love is not a \"straightforward endorsement of the court culture with which he was entwined\" (26). Instead of placing the two plays within the hitherto limited context of court politics, Collins explores the plays within a new setting of the stage rivalry between the Queen's Men and the King's Men. She argues that Killigrew's plays were employed as a competitive device by the Queens Men seeking to take their repertory in a new direction so as to distinguish itself from its rival and also as a way of engaging royal attention by employing, for the first time, a courtier playwright. Collins thus not only sheds light on the interpretation of Killigrews early plays but also increases our understanding of the repertory strategy of an important early modern playing company.In chapter 2, Victoria Bancroft analyzes Killigrews popular comedy, The Parsons Wedding, and sees the play as evidence of the playwright being both a traditionalist and innovator. The play, originally performed in 1641, secured its fame when it was re-produced in 1664 with an all-female cast. Modern critics have often suggested that the play was a precursor to the Restoration comedy of manners. Bancroft, however, argues that the play has made a more subtle contribution to the development of English drama. She suggests, for instance, that while Killigrew moves towards a new type of comedy \"privileging image and surface representation\" he also develops a \"traditional Renaissance dramaturgy in his consideration of the shifting relationship between actor, author, text and situation\" (62). Similarly Killigrews apparent experimentation with an all-female cast for both male and female roles betrays his covert wish for \"the restoration of a patriarchal society\" (50). Killigrews depiction of his contemporary and rival, William Davenant, as an off-stage character in the play further develops \"original themes introduced by Jonson and Brome\" (62). …","PeriodicalId":366404,"journal":{"name":"Restoration and Eighteenth-Century Theatre Research","volume":"12 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Restoration and Eighteenth-Century Theatre Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315551029","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Philip Major, ed. Thomas Killigrew and the Seventeenth-Century English Stage. Farnham: Ashgate Publishers, 2013. 236 pp. £60.00 (hardback); also available in ebook PDF. ISBN 9781409466680.As part of Ashgate's New Perspectives series, the book celebrates the quadricentenary of Thomas Killigrew's birth and re-examines the life and career of a man who, in the words of Philip Major, "possessed a ceaseless love of life, boundless energy, dogged determination, attractive cosmopolitanism, and witty articulacy" (2). This new study on the hitherto "strangely elusive figure" (1) is especially timely because of the staggering paucity of scholarship on Killigrew: Alfred Harbage wrote the last and only biography in 1930 and William T. Reich's edition of Claricilla in 1980 was the most recent publication of any of Killigrew's plays. The book, furthermore, comes out at a time when studies in royalism are becoming ever more popular and nuanced, rendering a new monograph on an influential royalist courtier such as Killigrew not only desirable but also essential. In this "more receptive and propitious critical atmosphere" (2) the eight contributors to the volume deal with different aspects of Killigrew's tumultuous life and his varied career. Over half a century on from Harbage's detailed study of Killigrew, this volume challenges the narrow one-dimensional characterization of Killigrew as a mere cavalier bon vivant and provides a newly complex and insightful portrayal of a man who was not a saint and was undoubtedly "one of the most colourful characters of the mid-seventeenth century" (1).In chapter 1, Eleanor Collins examines Thomas Killigrew's early plays of the 1630s when he was a Cockpit dramatist. During the period of "the second war of the theatres," Queen Henrietta's Men at the Cockpit produced two plays by Killigrew: The Prisoners and Claracilla. Through a close reading of the plays Collins persuasively argues against the conventional view that these pieces were primarily meant by Killigrew as a means of ingratiating himself with the queen. In particular Collins convincingly suggests that Killigrew's treatment of the theme of platonic love is not a "straightforward endorsement of the court culture with which he was entwined" (26). Instead of placing the two plays within the hitherto limited context of court politics, Collins explores the plays within a new setting of the stage rivalry between the Queen's Men and the King's Men. She argues that Killigrew's plays were employed as a competitive device by the Queens Men seeking to take their repertory in a new direction so as to distinguish itself from its rival and also as a way of engaging royal attention by employing, for the first time, a courtier playwright. Collins thus not only sheds light on the interpretation of Killigrews early plays but also increases our understanding of the repertory strategy of an important early modern playing company.In chapter 2, Victoria Bancroft analyzes Killigrews popular comedy, The Parsons Wedding, and sees the play as evidence of the playwright being both a traditionalist and innovator. The play, originally performed in 1641, secured its fame when it was re-produced in 1664 with an all-female cast. Modern critics have often suggested that the play was a precursor to the Restoration comedy of manners. Bancroft, however, argues that the play has made a more subtle contribution to the development of English drama. She suggests, for instance, that while Killigrew moves towards a new type of comedy "privileging image and surface representation" he also develops a "traditional Renaissance dramaturgy in his consideration of the shifting relationship between actor, author, text and situation" (62). Similarly Killigrews apparent experimentation with an all-female cast for both male and female roles betrays his covert wish for "the restoration of a patriarchal society" (50). Killigrews depiction of his contemporary and rival, William Davenant, as an off-stage character in the play further develops "original themes introduced by Jonson and Brome" (62). …
托马斯·基利格鲁与17世纪英国舞台
菲利普·梅杰主编,《托马斯·基利格鲁与17世纪英国舞台》。法纳姆:Ashgate出版社,2013年。236页,60英镑(精装本);也可在电子书PDF。ISBN 9781409466680。作为阿什盖特新视角系列的一部分,这本书庆祝托马斯·基利格鲁诞辰400周年,并重新审视了一个人的生活和事业,用菲利普·梅杰的话说,“拥有对生活的无尽热爱,无限的活力,顽强的决心,迷人的世界主义,机智的口才”(2)。由于关于基利格鲁的学术研究少得惊人,所以对这个迄今为止“奇怪的难以捉摸的人物”(1)的新研究尤其及时。阿尔弗雷德·哈比奇在1930年完成了最后一部也是唯一一部传记,威廉·t·赖希在1980年出版的《克拉丽西拉》是最新出版的基利格鲁戏剧。此外,这本书的出版正值对保皇派的研究变得越来越流行和细致入微的时候,这使得一本关于像基利格鲁这样有影响力的保皇派朝臣的新专著不仅是可取的,而且是必要的。在这种“更容易接受、更有利的批评氛围”下,该书的八位作者从不同的方面探讨了基利格鲁动荡的生活和他多变的职业生涯。半个多世纪以来,哈比奇对基利格鲁进行了详细的研究,这本书挑战了基利格鲁仅仅是一个生活放荡的骑士的狭隘的一维特征,并提供了一个新的复杂而深刻的人物形象,他不是圣人,无疑是“17世纪中叶最丰富多彩的人物之一”(1)。在第一章中,埃莉诺·柯林斯研究了托马斯·基利格鲁在17世纪30年代的早期戏剧,当时他是一位剧作家。在“第二次剧院战争”期间,亨丽埃塔女王的座舱里的人制作了基利格鲁的两部戏剧:《囚犯》和《克拉西拉》。通过对戏剧的仔细阅读,柯林斯有说服力地反驳了传统观点,即这些作品主要是基里格鲁讨好女王的一种手段。特别是,柯林斯令人信服地指出,基利格鲁对柏拉图式爱情主题的处理并不是“对与他纠缠在一起的宫廷文化的直接认可”(26)。柯林斯并没有将两部戏剧置于迄今为止有限的宫廷政治背景中,而是将两部戏剧置于王后剧团和国王剧团之间舞台竞争的新背景中进行探索。她认为,基里格鲁的戏剧是女王剧团的一种竞争手段,他们试图将自己的剧目推向一个新的方向,从而使自己与竞争对手区别开来,同时,通过首次聘用朝臣剧作家,基里格鲁的戏剧也是吸引王室注意力的一种方式。因此,柯林斯不仅阐明了对基利格鲁早期戏剧的解释,而且增加了我们对一个重要的早期现代戏剧公司的剧目策略的理解。在第二章中,维多利亚·班克罗夫特分析了基利格鲁的流行喜剧《帕森斯的婚礼》,并认为这部戏剧是这位剧作家既是传统主义者又是创新者的证据。该剧最初于1641年演出,在1664年以全女性演员重播后名声大噪。现代评论家经常认为这部剧是复辟时期礼仪喜剧的先驱。然而,班克罗夫特认为,这部剧对英国戏剧的发展做出了更为微妙的贡献。例如,她认为,当基利格鲁走向一种新的喜剧类型“强调形象和表面表现”时,他也发展了一种“在考虑演员、作者、文本和情境之间变化关系时的传统文艺复兴戏剧”(62)。同样,基利格鲁用全女性演员来扮演男性和女性角色的明显实验,暴露了他“恢复父权社会”的隐秘愿望(50)。基利格鲁将他的同辈和竞争对手威廉·达文南描绘为戏剧中的幕后人物,进一步发展了“约翰逊和布罗姆引入的原创主题”(62)。…
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信