Stress and Coping Styles among Patients with Drug-induced Psychosis and with Other Psychotic Disorders

Muhammad Numan Munir, Khalid Mahmood, A. Nadeem
{"title":"Stress and Coping Styles among Patients with Drug-induced Psychosis and with Other Psychotic Disorders","authors":"Muhammad Numan Munir, Khalid Mahmood, A. Nadeem","doi":"10.52461/pjap.v2i1.907","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The present study was conducted to explore the relationships of stress with different coping styles in patients with druginduced psychosis (PDIP) and the patients with other psychotic disorders (POPD) and to compare the PDIP and POPD with reference to the stress and coping styles. A total of 200 (i.e. 100 PDIP and 100 POPD) male patients (Age M= 33.52, SD = 1.48) were selected from different government and private hospitals/clinics in Lahore and Faisalabad city using a purposive sampling technique. Cross-sectional research design was used in the current study. The participants were administered Stress Subscale of Depression, Anxiety and Stress Scale (DASS-S) Urdu version and Coping Response Inventory (CRI) Urdu version to measure the level of stress and coping styles in the participants respectively. Findings indicated that stress was significantly associated with different coping strategies used by the patients. Stress was significantly higher in the POPD as compared to the PDIP. Furthermore, PDIP scored significantly higher as compared to the POPD on Approach Coping Styles whereas, POPD scored significantly higher as compared to the PDIP on Avoidant Coping Styles. The findings of the study would be helpful for mental health professionals.","PeriodicalId":361427,"journal":{"name":"Pakistan Journal of Applied Psychology","volume":"26 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pakistan Journal of Applied Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52461/pjap.v2i1.907","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The present study was conducted to explore the relationships of stress with different coping styles in patients with druginduced psychosis (PDIP) and the patients with other psychotic disorders (POPD) and to compare the PDIP and POPD with reference to the stress and coping styles. A total of 200 (i.e. 100 PDIP and 100 POPD) male patients (Age M= 33.52, SD = 1.48) were selected from different government and private hospitals/clinics in Lahore and Faisalabad city using a purposive sampling technique. Cross-sectional research design was used in the current study. The participants were administered Stress Subscale of Depression, Anxiety and Stress Scale (DASS-S) Urdu version and Coping Response Inventory (CRI) Urdu version to measure the level of stress and coping styles in the participants respectively. Findings indicated that stress was significantly associated with different coping strategies used by the patients. Stress was significantly higher in the POPD as compared to the PDIP. Furthermore, PDIP scored significantly higher as compared to the POPD on Approach Coping Styles whereas, POPD scored significantly higher as compared to the PDIP on Avoidant Coping Styles. The findings of the study would be helpful for mental health professionals.
药物性精神病及其他精神障碍患者的压力与应对方式
本研究旨在探讨药物性精神病(PDIP)和其他精神障碍(POPD)患者的应激与不同应对方式的关系,并比较PDIP和POPD在应激和应对方式方面的差异。采用有目的抽样方法,从拉合尔和费萨拉巴德市不同的政府和私立医院/诊所共选取200例(即100例PDIP和100例POPD)男性患者(年龄M= 33.52, SD = 1.48)。本研究采用横断面研究设计。采用乌尔都语版抑郁、焦虑和压力量表(DASS-S)和应对反应量表(CRI)分别测量被试的压力水平和应对方式。结果表明,压力与患者使用的不同应对策略显著相关。与PDIP相比,POPD的压力明显更高。此外,PDIP在接近性应对方式上的得分显著高于POPD,而POPD在回避性应对方式上的得分显著高于PDIP。这项研究的结果将对心理健康专业人员有所帮助。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信