Early prognostication of ischemic stroke using computed tomography perfusion and S100 beta level

H. Elatroush, D. Ragab, K. Mashhour, M. Afify, Ahmad Salah
{"title":"Early prognostication of ischemic stroke using computed tomography perfusion and S100 beta level","authors":"H. Elatroush, D. Ragab, K. Mashhour, M. Afify, Ahmad Salah","doi":"10.4103/roaic.roaic_86_21","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background Early outcome prediction in ischemic stroke is a crucial concern for clinicians for proper decisions to reduce morbidity and mortality. The present study aimed to compare between computed tomography (CT) perfusion, National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS), and S100β for early outcome prediction. Patients and methods The study was carried out on 50 adult patients with acute ischemic stroke, classified into two groups according to modified Rankin score into group I (favorable outcome) and group II (unfavorable outcome). CT-perfusion was done on admission, NIHSS was calculated on admission, and blood was withdrawn on admission and third day for S100β. Results Infarction core size and the penumbra size were larger significantly in unfavorable-outcome group (P<0.001). Also, S100β levels and NIHSS on admission were higher in group 2 than group 1 significantly (P<0.001, P=0.001, respectively). Area under the curves were 0.787 for NIHSS score, 0.877 for S100β level, and 0.844 for penumbra size. A combination between penumbra size, S100β, and NIHSS to predict outcome. The receiver operating characteristic curve yielded an area under the curve of 0.905 (P<0.001). Furthermore, the comparison between a combination of penumbra size, S100β, NIHSS on admission, and the final infarct in noncontrast CT on day 3 had a significant positive correlation coefficient (r=0.577, P<0.001). Conclusion We suggest that higher NIHSS score on admission, large core and penumbra size, and high S100β level are independent early predictors of the functional outcome for acute ischemic-stroke patients. Moreover, detecting cases with NIHSS score more than 19, S100β more than 241 pg/ml, core size more than 10.35 cm3, and penumbra size more than 17.9 cm3, can individually predict unfavorable functional outcome in acute ischemic-stroke patients. Hence, using these cutoffs in combination might predict the outcome in a more precise manner.","PeriodicalId":151256,"journal":{"name":"Research and Opinion in Anesthesia and Intensive Care","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research and Opinion in Anesthesia and Intensive Care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/roaic.roaic_86_21","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background Early outcome prediction in ischemic stroke is a crucial concern for clinicians for proper decisions to reduce morbidity and mortality. The present study aimed to compare between computed tomography (CT) perfusion, National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS), and S100β for early outcome prediction. Patients and methods The study was carried out on 50 adult patients with acute ischemic stroke, classified into two groups according to modified Rankin score into group I (favorable outcome) and group II (unfavorable outcome). CT-perfusion was done on admission, NIHSS was calculated on admission, and blood was withdrawn on admission and third day for S100β. Results Infarction core size and the penumbra size were larger significantly in unfavorable-outcome group (P<0.001). Also, S100β levels and NIHSS on admission were higher in group 2 than group 1 significantly (P<0.001, P=0.001, respectively). Area under the curves were 0.787 for NIHSS score, 0.877 for S100β level, and 0.844 for penumbra size. A combination between penumbra size, S100β, and NIHSS to predict outcome. The receiver operating characteristic curve yielded an area under the curve of 0.905 (P<0.001). Furthermore, the comparison between a combination of penumbra size, S100β, NIHSS on admission, and the final infarct in noncontrast CT on day 3 had a significant positive correlation coefficient (r=0.577, P<0.001). Conclusion We suggest that higher NIHSS score on admission, large core and penumbra size, and high S100β level are independent early predictors of the functional outcome for acute ischemic-stroke patients. Moreover, detecting cases with NIHSS score more than 19, S100β more than 241 pg/ml, core size more than 10.35 cm3, and penumbra size more than 17.9 cm3, can individually predict unfavorable functional outcome in acute ischemic-stroke patients. Hence, using these cutoffs in combination might predict the outcome in a more precise manner.
计算机断层扫描灌注和S100 β水平对缺血性脑卒中的早期预测
背景缺血性脑卒中的早期预后预测是临床医生做出正确决策以降低发病率和死亡率的关键问题。本研究旨在比较计算机断层扫描(CT)灌注、美国国立卫生研究院卒中量表(NIHSS)和S100β对早期预后预测的影响。患者与方法研究对象为50例成年急性缺血性脑卒中患者,根据改良Rankin评分将患者分为I组(预后良好)和II组(预后不良)。入院时行ct灌注,入院时计算NIHSS,入院及第3天取血检测S100β。结果不良结局组梗死核尺寸和半暗区尺寸显著增大(P<0.001)。2组患者入院时S100β水平和NIHSS均显著高于1组(P<0.001, P=0.001)。NIHSS评分曲线下面积为0.787,S100β水平曲线下面积为0.877,半影面积曲线下面积为0.844。半暗带大小、S100β和NIHSS的组合预测预后。受试者工作特征曲线下面积为0.905 (P<0.001)。此外,入院时的半影大小、S100β、NIHSS与第3天非对比CT的最终梗死面积的组合具有显著的正相关系数(r=0.577, P<0.001)。结论入院时较高的NIHSS评分、较大的脑核和半暗区大小以及较高的S100β水平是急性缺血性脑卒中患者功能结局的独立早期预测指标。此外,检测NIHSS评分大于19,S100β大于241 pg/ml,核心尺寸大于10.35 cm3,半影尺寸大于17.9 cm3的病例,可以单独预测急性缺血性脑卒中患者的不良功能结局。因此,结合使用这些截止点可能会以更精确的方式预测结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信