High-Speed Rotorcraft Pitch Axis Response Type Investigation

T. Berger, Jeneva Horn, M. Tischler
{"title":"High-Speed Rotorcraft Pitch Axis Response Type Investigation","authors":"T. Berger, Jeneva Horn, M. Tischler","doi":"10.4050/f-0077-2021-16793","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n This paper presents a systematic investigation of high-speed rotorcraft pitch-axis response types, command models, and handling-qualities specifications. The investigation was done using two Future Vertical Lift-relevant rotorcraft configurations—a lift offset coaxial helicopter with a pusher propeller and a tiltrotor. Five response types were investigated, consisting of: a pitch rate-command/attitude-hold response type typically used for rotorcraft, a pitch ratecommand/attitude-hold response type using a higher-order command model based on the conventional airplane pitch rate transfer function, a normal acceleration/angle-of-attack hold response type, a flight path rate command/flight path hold response type, and a “blended” flight path rate command response type which varies the command model bandwidth based on stick input size. Designs of varying levels of pitch attitude bandwidth, flight path bandwidth, control anticipation parameter, and pitch attitude dropback were evaluated in a piloted simulation experiment conducted at the Penn State Flight Simulator facility using two high-speed Mission Task Elements. The results of the piloted simulation suggest that both the pitch attitude bandwidth and the pitch attitude dropback requirements must be met for Level 1 handling qualities. In addition, the current fixed-wing boundary for pitch attitude dropback appears to be too loose for high speed rotorcraft, and should be tightened to better match with pilot ratings. A set of recommended specifications and associated updated Level boundaries is provided in the Appendix.\n","PeriodicalId":273020,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the Vertical Flight Society 77th Annual Forum","volume":"29 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the Vertical Flight Society 77th Annual Forum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4050/f-0077-2021-16793","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper presents a systematic investigation of high-speed rotorcraft pitch-axis response types, command models, and handling-qualities specifications. The investigation was done using two Future Vertical Lift-relevant rotorcraft configurations—a lift offset coaxial helicopter with a pusher propeller and a tiltrotor. Five response types were investigated, consisting of: a pitch rate-command/attitude-hold response type typically used for rotorcraft, a pitch ratecommand/attitude-hold response type using a higher-order command model based on the conventional airplane pitch rate transfer function, a normal acceleration/angle-of-attack hold response type, a flight path rate command/flight path hold response type, and a “blended” flight path rate command response type which varies the command model bandwidth based on stick input size. Designs of varying levels of pitch attitude bandwidth, flight path bandwidth, control anticipation parameter, and pitch attitude dropback were evaluated in a piloted simulation experiment conducted at the Penn State Flight Simulator facility using two high-speed Mission Task Elements. The results of the piloted simulation suggest that both the pitch attitude bandwidth and the pitch attitude dropback requirements must be met for Level 1 handling qualities. In addition, the current fixed-wing boundary for pitch attitude dropback appears to be too loose for high speed rotorcraft, and should be tightened to better match with pilot ratings. A set of recommended specifications and associated updated Level boundaries is provided in the Appendix.
高速旋翼机俯仰轴响应类型研究
本文系统地研究了高速旋翼机的俯仰轴响应类型、指挥模型和操纵质量规范。调查使用了两种与未来垂直升力相关的旋翼机配置-一种升力偏移同轴直升机,带有推进螺旋桨和倾转旋翼。调查了五种反应类型,包括:一种通常用于旋翼飞机的俯仰率-命令/姿态保持响应类型,一种俯仰率命令/姿态保持响应类型,使用基于传统飞机俯仰率传递函数的高阶命令模型,一种普通加速度/迎角保持响应类型,一种飞行路径率命令/飞行路径保持响应类型,以及一种“混合”飞行路径率命令响应类型,该响应类型根据操纵杆输入大小改变命令模型带宽。在宾夕法尼亚州立大学飞行模拟器设施中,利用两个高速任务单元,对不同水平的俯仰姿态带宽、飞行路径带宽、控制预期参数和俯仰姿态后降设计进行了评估。导航仿真结果表明,俯仰姿态带宽和俯仰姿态回降都必须满足1级操纵质量的要求。此外,对于高速旋翼飞机来说,目前固定翼的俯仰姿态下降边界似乎过于宽松,应该收紧,以更好地与飞行员等级相匹配。附录提供了一套建议的规格和相关的更新的关卡边界。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信