Sustainability assessment of two Australian hydro megaprojects

G. Currie, J. Black, C. Duffield
{"title":"Sustainability assessment of two Australian hydro megaprojects","authors":"G. Currie, J. Black, C. Duffield","doi":"10.1080/24724718.2021.1930970","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This paper comprises comparative sustainability assessments of the Snowy 2.0 pumped hydro project and the Snowy 1.0 hydro project. The compliance of these two projects is studied using the Hydropower Sustainability Assessment Protocol (HSAP). The method for Snowy 1.0, built between 1949 and 1974, was an ex-post analysis using historical documents. The method for Snowy 2.0, recently approved for construction and due for completion in 2024, was to review government documents and interview key stakeholders. These stakeholders included people with intimate knowledge of Snowy 2.0 and other megaproject experts per se. Transcripts of these interviews were analyzed, and summary arguments developed. The interview questions were structured around the Early Stage and Preparation phases in the Hydropower Sustainability Assessment Protocol. The conclusion is that Snowy 1.0 performed well on the sustainability assessment but that Snowy 2.0 fails to meet the Protocol's technical, economic, governance and environmental measures.","PeriodicalId":143411,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Mega Infrastructure & Sustainable Development","volume":"44 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Mega Infrastructure & Sustainable Development","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/24724718.2021.1930970","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Abstract This paper comprises comparative sustainability assessments of the Snowy 2.0 pumped hydro project and the Snowy 1.0 hydro project. The compliance of these two projects is studied using the Hydropower Sustainability Assessment Protocol (HSAP). The method for Snowy 1.0, built between 1949 and 1974, was an ex-post analysis using historical documents. The method for Snowy 2.0, recently approved for construction and due for completion in 2024, was to review government documents and interview key stakeholders. These stakeholders included people with intimate knowledge of Snowy 2.0 and other megaproject experts per se. Transcripts of these interviews were analyzed, and summary arguments developed. The interview questions were structured around the Early Stage and Preparation phases in the Hydropower Sustainability Assessment Protocol. The conclusion is that Snowy 1.0 performed well on the sustainability assessment but that Snowy 2.0 fails to meet the Protocol's technical, economic, governance and environmental measures.
两个澳大利亚大型水电项目的可持续性评估
摘要本文对Snowy 2.0抽水蓄能工程和Snowy 1.0抽水蓄能工程的可持续性进行了比较评价。采用水电可持续性评估协议(HSAP)对这两个项目的合规性进行了研究。在1949年至1974年之间建立的Snowy 1.0的方法是使用历史文献的事后分析。最近批准建设的Snowy 2.0计划于2024年完工,其方法是审查政府文件并采访关键利益相关者。这些利益相关者包括对Snowy 2.0有深入了解的人以及其他大型项目专家。对这些访谈的文字记录进行了分析,并提出了总结论点。访谈问题围绕水电可持续性评估协议的早期阶段和准备阶段进行。结论是,Snowy 1.0在可持续性评估中表现良好,而Snowy 2.0未能满足议定书的技术、经济、治理和环境措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信