UniTerm - Formats and Terminology Exchange

LDV Forum Pub Date : 2006-07-01 DOI:10.21248/jlcl.21.2006.79
W. Zenk
{"title":"UniTerm - Formats and Terminology Exchange","authors":"W. Zenk","doi":"10.21248/jlcl.21.2006.79","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"LDV FORUM – Band 21(1) – 2006 Abstract Th is article presents UniTerm, a typical representative of terminology management systems (TMS). Th e fi rst part will highlight common characteristics of TMS and give further insight into the UniTerm entry format and database design. Practise has shown that automatic, i.e. blind exchange of terminologies is diffi cult to achieve. Th e second section gives criteria where the exchange between diff erent TMS can fail and points out the relationship between the UniTerm like TMS data formats and existing terminology standards. Finally, it will be discussed what requirements have to be met in order to enable a deeper integration of terminology standards in a TMS and thus also a smoother transition between diff erent TMS. Th ese requirements are evaluated with Acolada s next generation TMS UniTerm Enterprise.","PeriodicalId":346957,"journal":{"name":"LDV Forum","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2006-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"LDV Forum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21248/jlcl.21.2006.79","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

LDV FORUM – Band 21(1) – 2006 Abstract Th is article presents UniTerm, a typical representative of terminology management systems (TMS). Th e fi rst part will highlight common characteristics of TMS and give further insight into the UniTerm entry format and database design. Practise has shown that automatic, i.e. blind exchange of terminologies is diffi cult to achieve. Th e second section gives criteria where the exchange between diff erent TMS can fail and points out the relationship between the UniTerm like TMS data formats and existing terminology standards. Finally, it will be discussed what requirements have to be met in order to enable a deeper integration of terminology standards in a TMS and thus also a smoother transition between diff erent TMS. Th ese requirements are evaluated with Acolada s next generation TMS UniTerm Enterprise.
格式和术语交换
摘要本文介绍了术语管理系统(TMS)的典型代表unterm。第一部分将重点介绍TMS的共同特征,并进一步深入了解UniTerm条目格式和数据库设计。实践表明,术语的自动,即盲目交换是很难实现的。第二部分给出了不同TMS之间交换可能失败的标准,并指出了UniTerm(如TMS数据格式)与现有术语标准之间的关系。最后,将讨论为了在TMS中实现更深层次的术语标准集成,从而在不同的TMS之间实现更平滑的转换,必须满足哪些要求。这些需求是用Acolada的下一代TMS UniTerm Enterprise进行评估的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信