Chapter 1. Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep Dressed in Street Fashions?: Investigating Virtually Constructed Fashion Subcultures

Therèsa M. Winge
{"title":"Chapter 1. Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep Dressed in Street Fashions?: Investigating Virtually Constructed Fashion Subcultures","authors":"Therèsa M. Winge","doi":"10.1108/978-1-78756-511-120181003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract \nIn May 2016, Aleks Eror’s op-ed article ‘Dear fashion industry: Stop making up bogus subcultures’ on the HighSnobiety website accuses the fashion industry of creating ‘quasi-subcultures’, such as Normcore, Seapunk and Health Goth to promote specific fashion trends via the Internet. Eror argues that these fashion subcultures do not exist in resistance to mainstream culture (as he understands subcultures), but instead offer the specific fashions and their designers cache for being associated with a counterculture and connecting with alternative trends. Setting aside Eror’s narrow understanding of subcultures, he raises questions of authenticity and the current state of virtual fashion subcultures. \n \nStill, there is evidence of these subcultures online and growing in substantial numbers regardless of their inception. Furthermore, persons identifying themselves with these groups practice alternativity, which delineates their scenes, artefacts, and practices from those of mainstream Western society. I pursue questions of authenticity regarding these recent fashion subcultures who appear to emerge in close proximity to the launch of specific fashions. The author explores the ways in which these fashion subcultural experiences differ from known subcultures. The author investigates notions of constructed resistance and perceived alternativity and marginalization, as well as how that positionality manifests into a fashion subculture identity.","PeriodicalId":439873,"journal":{"name":"Subcultures, Bodies and Spaces: Essays on Alternativity and Marginalization","volume":"54 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-09-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Subcultures, Bodies and Spaces: Essays on Alternativity and Marginalization","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/978-1-78756-511-120181003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Abstract In May 2016, Aleks Eror’s op-ed article ‘Dear fashion industry: Stop making up bogus subcultures’ on the HighSnobiety website accuses the fashion industry of creating ‘quasi-subcultures’, such as Normcore, Seapunk and Health Goth to promote specific fashion trends via the Internet. Eror argues that these fashion subcultures do not exist in resistance to mainstream culture (as he understands subcultures), but instead offer the specific fashions and their designers cache for being associated with a counterculture and connecting with alternative trends. Setting aside Eror’s narrow understanding of subcultures, he raises questions of authenticity and the current state of virtual fashion subcultures. Still, there is evidence of these subcultures online and growing in substantial numbers regardless of their inception. Furthermore, persons identifying themselves with these groups practice alternativity, which delineates their scenes, artefacts, and practices from those of mainstream Western society. I pursue questions of authenticity regarding these recent fashion subcultures who appear to emerge in close proximity to the launch of specific fashions. The author explores the ways in which these fashion subcultural experiences differ from known subcultures. The author investigates notions of constructed resistance and perceived alternativity and marginalization, as well as how that positionality manifests into a fashion subculture identity.
第1章。机器人会梦见穿着街头时尚的电子羊吗?:调查虚拟构建的时尚亚文化
2016年5月,Aleks Eror在HighSnobiety网站上发表了一篇题为《亲爱的时尚产业:停止编造虚假亚文化》的专栏文章,指责时尚产业创造了“准亚文化”,如Normcore、Seapunk和Health Goth,通过互联网推广特定的时尚趋势。埃尔认为,这些时尚亚文化并不存在于对主流文化的抵制中(正如他对亚文化的理解),而是为特定的时尚及其设计师提供了与反主流文化联系在一起并与另类趋势联系在一起的缓冲。撇开Eror对亚文化的狭隘理解,他提出了关于真实性和虚拟时尚亚文化现状的问题。尽管如此,有证据表明,这些亚文化在网络上存在,而且无论其起源如何,它们的数量都在不断增长。此外,认同于这些群体的人实践替代性,这将他们的场景、人工制品和实践与主流西方社会区分开来。我追求的是这些最近的时尚亚文化的真实性问题,这些亚文化似乎是在特定时尚的发布附近出现的。作者探讨了这些时尚亚文化体验与已知亚文化的不同之处。作者研究了建构性抵抗、感知替代性和边缘化的概念,以及这种位置性如何体现为时尚亚文化身份。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信