Test case prioritization techniques “an empirical study”

Neha Sharma, Sujata, G. Purohit
{"title":"Test case prioritization techniques “an empirical study”","authors":"Neha Sharma, Sujata, G. Purohit","doi":"10.1109/ICHPCA.2014.7045344","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Regression testing is an expensive process. A number of methodologies of regression testing are used to improve its effectiveness. These are retest all, test case selection, test case reduction and test case prioritization. Retest all technique involves re-execution of all available test suites, which are critical moreover cost effective. In order to increase efficiency, test case prioritization is being utilized for rearranging the test cases. A number of algorithms has been stated in the literature survey such as Greedy Algorithms and Metaheuristic search algorithms. A simple greedy algorithm focuses on test case prioritization but results in less efficient manner, due to which researches moved towards the additional greedy and 2-Optimal algorithms. Forthcoming metaheuristic search technique (Hill climbing and Genetic Algorithm) produces a much better solution to the test case prioritization problem. It implements stochastic optimization while dealing with problem concern. The genetic algorithm is an evolutionary algorithm which gives an exact mathematical fitness value for the test cases on which prioritization is done. This paper focuses on the comparison of metaheuristic genetic algorithm with other algorithms and proves the efficiency of genetic algorithm over the remaining ones.","PeriodicalId":197528,"journal":{"name":"2014 International Conference on High Performance Computing and Applications (ICHPCA)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"22","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2014 International Conference on High Performance Computing and Applications (ICHPCA)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICHPCA.2014.7045344","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 22

Abstract

Regression testing is an expensive process. A number of methodologies of regression testing are used to improve its effectiveness. These are retest all, test case selection, test case reduction and test case prioritization. Retest all technique involves re-execution of all available test suites, which are critical moreover cost effective. In order to increase efficiency, test case prioritization is being utilized for rearranging the test cases. A number of algorithms has been stated in the literature survey such as Greedy Algorithms and Metaheuristic search algorithms. A simple greedy algorithm focuses on test case prioritization but results in less efficient manner, due to which researches moved towards the additional greedy and 2-Optimal algorithms. Forthcoming metaheuristic search technique (Hill climbing and Genetic Algorithm) produces a much better solution to the test case prioritization problem. It implements stochastic optimization while dealing with problem concern. The genetic algorithm is an evolutionary algorithm which gives an exact mathematical fitness value for the test cases on which prioritization is done. This paper focuses on the comparison of metaheuristic genetic algorithm with other algorithms and proves the efficiency of genetic algorithm over the remaining ones.
测试用例优先化技术“实证研究”
回归测试是一个昂贵的过程。一些回归测试的方法被用来提高其有效性。它们是重新测试全部,测试用例选择,测试用例减少和测试用例优先级排序。重新测试所有技术包括重新执行所有可用的测试套件,这是至关重要的,而且具有成本效益。为了提高效率,测试用例优先级被用于重新安排测试用例。在文献综述中提出了一些算法,如贪心算法和元启发式搜索算法。简单的贪心算法侧重于测试用例的优先排序,但效率较低,因此研究转向了额外的贪心算法和2-Optimal算法。即将到来的元启发式搜索技术(爬坡和遗传算法)为测试用例优先级问题提供了更好的解决方案。它在处理问题关注的同时实现了随机优化。遗传算法是一种进化算法,它为测试用例提供精确的数学适应度值,并在此基础上进行优先级排序。本文将元启发式遗传算法与其他算法进行了比较,并证明了遗传算法的有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信