Memory system energy: Influence of hardware-software optimizations

G. Esakkimuthu, N. Vijaykrishnan, M. Kandemir, M. J. Irwin
{"title":"Memory system energy: Influence of hardware-software optimizations","authors":"G. Esakkimuthu, N. Vijaykrishnan, M. Kandemir, M. J. Irwin","doi":"10.1109/LPE.2000.155291","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A memory system usually consumes a significant amount of energy in many battery-operated devices. In this paper, we provide a quantitative comparison and evaluation of the interaction of two hardware cache optimization mechanisms (block buffering and sub-banking) and three widely used compiler optimization techniques (linear loop transformation, loop tiling, and loop unrolling). Our results show that the pure hardware optimizations (eight block buffers and four sub-banks in a 4K, 2-way cache) provided up to 4% energy saving, with an average saving of 2% across all benchmarks. In contrast, the pure software optimization approach that uses all three compiler optimizations, provided at least 23% energy saving, with an average of 62%. However, a closer observation reveals that hardware optimization becomes more critical for on-chip cache energy reduction when executing optimized codes.","PeriodicalId":188020,"journal":{"name":"ISLPED'00: Proceedings of the 2000 International Symposium on Low Power Electronics and Design (Cat. No.00TH8514)","volume":"13 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2000-07-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"24","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ISLPED'00: Proceedings of the 2000 International Symposium on Low Power Electronics and Design (Cat. No.00TH8514)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/LPE.2000.155291","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 24

Abstract

A memory system usually consumes a significant amount of energy in many battery-operated devices. In this paper, we provide a quantitative comparison and evaluation of the interaction of two hardware cache optimization mechanisms (block buffering and sub-banking) and three widely used compiler optimization techniques (linear loop transformation, loop tiling, and loop unrolling). Our results show that the pure hardware optimizations (eight block buffers and four sub-banks in a 4K, 2-way cache) provided up to 4% energy saving, with an average saving of 2% across all benchmarks. In contrast, the pure software optimization approach that uses all three compiler optimizations, provided at least 23% energy saving, with an average of 62%. However, a closer observation reveals that hardware optimization becomes more critical for on-chip cache energy reduction when executing optimized codes.
存储系统能量:硬件软件优化的影响
在许多电池供电的设备中,存储系统通常会消耗大量的能量。在本文中,我们对两种硬件缓存优化机制(块缓冲和子银行)和三种广泛使用的编译器优化技术(线性循环转换,循环平铺和循环展开)的相互作用进行了定量比较和评估。我们的结果表明,纯硬件优化(4K 2路缓存中的8个块缓冲区和4个子银行)最多可节省4%的能源,在所有基准测试中平均节省2%。相比之下,使用所有三种编译器优化的纯软件优化方法提供了至少23%的节能,平均为62%。然而,仔细观察就会发现,在执行优化代码时,硬件优化对于减少片上缓存能量变得更加关键。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信