On accurate, automated and insightful deviation analysis of clinical protocols

H. Yan, Xudong Lu, P. V. Gorp, S. Heines, Shan Nan, W. V. Mook, D. Bergmans, U. Kaymak, H. Duan
{"title":"On accurate, automated and insightful deviation analysis of clinical protocols","authors":"H. Yan, Xudong Lu, P. V. Gorp, S. Heines, Shan Nan, W. V. Mook, D. Bergmans, U. Kaymak, H. Duan","doi":"10.1109/BIBM.2018.8621133","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Clinical guidelines, pathways and protocols are introduced to standardize and provide best-practice care. Analyzing deviations of actual care against the documented best practices is useful to find opportunities for complying better in the future. Prior work demonstrates that deviation analyses should be accurate, automated and insightful but only few studies manage to satisfy all three intentions. In this paper, we manage to reconcile accuracy with automation and insightfulness by combining the previously disconnected steps of checking and mining in compliance analysis software. Results are achieved using an algorithm that consists of three steps. We demonstrate the effectiveness of the algorithm via a real-life case from the intensive care unit of a Dutch hospital.","PeriodicalId":108667,"journal":{"name":"2018 IEEE International Conference on Bioinformatics and Biomedicine (BIBM)","volume":"64 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2018 IEEE International Conference on Bioinformatics and Biomedicine (BIBM)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/BIBM.2018.8621133","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Clinical guidelines, pathways and protocols are introduced to standardize and provide best-practice care. Analyzing deviations of actual care against the documented best practices is useful to find opportunities for complying better in the future. Prior work demonstrates that deviation analyses should be accurate, automated and insightful but only few studies manage to satisfy all three intentions. In this paper, we manage to reconcile accuracy with automation and insightfulness by combining the previously disconnected steps of checking and mining in compliance analysis software. Results are achieved using an algorithm that consists of three steps. We demonstrate the effectiveness of the algorithm via a real-life case from the intensive care unit of a Dutch hospital.
对临床方案进行准确、自动化和深刻的偏差分析
引入临床指南、途径和协议,以标准化和提供最佳实践护理。根据文档化的最佳实践分析实际护理的偏差,有助于找到在将来更好地遵循的机会。先前的工作表明,偏差分析应该是准确的、自动化的和有洞察力的,但只有少数研究能够满足所有三个意图。在本文中,我们通过将先前不相关的检查和挖掘步骤结合在合规性分析软件中,设法使准确性与自动化和洞察力相协调。使用由三个步骤组成的算法获得结果。我们通过一个来自荷兰医院重症监护室的真实案例来证明该算法的有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信