Correlation of Serum Cystatin C with Glomerular Filtration Rate in Patients Receiving Platinum-Based Chemotherapy

E. Cavalcanti, Vittoria Barchiesi, Dionigio Cerasuolo, F. Di Paola, M. Cantile, S. Cecere, S. Pignata, A. Morabito, R. Costanzo, M. Di Maio, F. Perrone
{"title":"Correlation of Serum Cystatin C with Glomerular Filtration Rate in Patients Receiving Platinum-Based Chemotherapy","authors":"E. Cavalcanti, Vittoria Barchiesi, Dionigio Cerasuolo, F. Di Paola, M. Cantile, S. Cecere, S. Pignata, A. Morabito, R. Costanzo, M. Di Maio, F. Perrone","doi":"10.1155/2016/4918325","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives. Serum cystatin C seems to be an accurate marker of glomerular filtration rate (GFR) compared to serum creatinine. The aim of this work was to explore the possibility of using serum cystatin C instead of serum creatinine to early predict renal failure in cancer patients who received platinum based chemotherapy. Design and Methods. Serum creatinine, serum cystatin C concentrations, and GFR were determined simultaneously in 52 cancer patients received carboplatin-based or cisplatin-based chemotherapy. Serum creatinine was assayed on Cobas C6000-Roche, serum cystatin C assay was performed on AIA 360-Tosoh, and GFR was determined in all patients, before the first cycle of chemotherapy and before the subsequent administrations. Results. In the overall series, for the prediction of a fall of GFR < 80 mL/min/1.73 m2, the AUC of the ROC curve for cystatin C was 0,667 and the best threshold was 1.135 mg/L (sensitivity 90.5%, specificity 61.1%). For a GFR fall < 60 mL/min/1.73 m2, the AUC of ROC curve for cystatin C was 74.3% and the best threshold was 1.415 mg/L (sensitivity 66.7%, specificity 73.2%). Conclusions. Baseline cystatin C values were not able to predict renal failure during subsequent treatment. In conclusion, serum cystatin C is not a reliable early marker to efficiently predict renal failure in patients receiving chemotherapy.","PeriodicalId":313227,"journal":{"name":"Analytical Cellular Pathology (Amsterdam)","volume":"221 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-12-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Analytical Cellular Pathology (Amsterdam)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/4918325","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

Objectives. Serum cystatin C seems to be an accurate marker of glomerular filtration rate (GFR) compared to serum creatinine. The aim of this work was to explore the possibility of using serum cystatin C instead of serum creatinine to early predict renal failure in cancer patients who received platinum based chemotherapy. Design and Methods. Serum creatinine, serum cystatin C concentrations, and GFR were determined simultaneously in 52 cancer patients received carboplatin-based or cisplatin-based chemotherapy. Serum creatinine was assayed on Cobas C6000-Roche, serum cystatin C assay was performed on AIA 360-Tosoh, and GFR was determined in all patients, before the first cycle of chemotherapy and before the subsequent administrations. Results. In the overall series, for the prediction of a fall of GFR < 80 mL/min/1.73 m2, the AUC of the ROC curve for cystatin C was 0,667 and the best threshold was 1.135 mg/L (sensitivity 90.5%, specificity 61.1%). For a GFR fall < 60 mL/min/1.73 m2, the AUC of ROC curve for cystatin C was 74.3% and the best threshold was 1.415 mg/L (sensitivity 66.7%, specificity 73.2%). Conclusions. Baseline cystatin C values were not able to predict renal failure during subsequent treatment. In conclusion, serum cystatin C is not a reliable early marker to efficiently predict renal failure in patients receiving chemotherapy.
铂类化疗患者血清胱抑素C与肾小球滤过率的相关性
目标。与血清肌酐相比,血清胱抑素C似乎是肾小球滤过率(GFR)的准确标志物。这项工作的目的是探索使用血清胱抑素C代替血清肌酐来早期预测接受铂类化疗的癌症患者肾功能衰竭的可能性。设计和方法。同时测定52例接受卡铂或顺铂化疗的癌症患者的血清肌酐、血清胱抑素C浓度和GFR。所有患者在第一周期化疗前及后续给药前均采用Cobas C6000-Roche检测血清肌酐,AIA 360-Tosoh检测血清胱抑素C,并测定GFR。结果。在整个系列中,对于预测GFR < 80 mL/min/1.73 m2的下降,胱抑素C的ROC曲线AUC为0.667,最佳阈值为1.135 mg/L(敏感性90.5%,特异性61.1%)。GFR < 60 mL/min/1.73 m2时,胱抑素C的ROC曲线AUC为74.3%,最佳阈值为1.415 mg/L(敏感性66.7%,特异性73.2%)。结论。基线胱抑素C值不能预测后续治疗期间的肾功能衰竭。综上所述,血清胱抑素C并不是有效预测化疗患者肾功能衰竭的可靠早期指标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信