The Transnational Illegal Market of Trafficking in Human Beings – Actors and Discourses: A Transatlantic Comparison

J. Nautz, Euridice Marquez
{"title":"The Transnational Illegal Market of Trafficking in Human Beings – Actors and Discourses: A Transatlantic Comparison","authors":"J. Nautz, Euridice Marquez","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1832552","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The paper analyses the development of trafficking in human beings (THB) as an economic crime and as a severe violation of human rights by focusing on the different actors’ involved in counter-trafficking efforts. The paper outlines how the crime evolved in Austria, Germany and the United States of America (USA) since the 19th century until present. The phenomenon of human trafficking as defined by the UN Trafficking Protocol of 2000 it relates to slavery and it is considered as modern day slavery. Finding the right words to describe the crime remains a persistent challenge in combating human trafficking. Most formulations used to describe trafficking focus on the trade or buying and selling of people, or they mean something closer to “smuggling,” which relates specifically to movement over borders. These words, including the word trafficking in English, may not adequately capture the most important aspect of the practice: exploitation. Nevertheless, it is important to note that in the 19th and early 20th century practices nowadays considered as human trafficking referred as ‘White Slavery’, Slavery and ‘Madchenhandel’. THB was also primarily saw as a feeding of the sex industry; excluding forced labour, domestic servitude, forced begging, among other forms of human trafficking from the today internationally agreed upon definition. A growing demand for (cheap) labour, sexual services and women for (forced) marriages, economic and demographic disparities have stimulated the trafficking and smuggling in human beings through time. The perpetrators force the individuals to work in conditions of forced labour, servitude, or debt bondage; this privation of freedom and poor living conditions is thus a severe violation of human rights. Efforts to combat THB have mostly been geared at victim support and prevention as a response to the severe harm to victims, but little has been done to diminish the profitability of the business, which is why it is valuable to look at how this business has developed through time. Trafficking still remains a very profitable business in which the traffickers face relatively small risks.","PeriodicalId":181409,"journal":{"name":"LSN: Other Public International Law: Human Rights (Topic)","volume":"24 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-04-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"LSN: Other Public International Law: Human Rights (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1832552","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The paper analyses the development of trafficking in human beings (THB) as an economic crime and as a severe violation of human rights by focusing on the different actors’ involved in counter-trafficking efforts. The paper outlines how the crime evolved in Austria, Germany and the United States of America (USA) since the 19th century until present. The phenomenon of human trafficking as defined by the UN Trafficking Protocol of 2000 it relates to slavery and it is considered as modern day slavery. Finding the right words to describe the crime remains a persistent challenge in combating human trafficking. Most formulations used to describe trafficking focus on the trade or buying and selling of people, or they mean something closer to “smuggling,” which relates specifically to movement over borders. These words, including the word trafficking in English, may not adequately capture the most important aspect of the practice: exploitation. Nevertheless, it is important to note that in the 19th and early 20th century practices nowadays considered as human trafficking referred as ‘White Slavery’, Slavery and ‘Madchenhandel’. THB was also primarily saw as a feeding of the sex industry; excluding forced labour, domestic servitude, forced begging, among other forms of human trafficking from the today internationally agreed upon definition. A growing demand for (cheap) labour, sexual services and women for (forced) marriages, economic and demographic disparities have stimulated the trafficking and smuggling in human beings through time. The perpetrators force the individuals to work in conditions of forced labour, servitude, or debt bondage; this privation of freedom and poor living conditions is thus a severe violation of human rights. Efforts to combat THB have mostly been geared at victim support and prevention as a response to the severe harm to victims, but little has been done to diminish the profitability of the business, which is why it is valuable to look at how this business has developed through time. Trafficking still remains a very profitable business in which the traffickers face relatively small risks.
跨国非法人口贩卖市场——行动者与话语:跨大西洋比较
本文分析了人口贩运作为一种经济犯罪和严重侵犯人权行为的发展,重点关注了参与打击人口贩运工作的不同行为者。该文件概述了自19世纪至今奥地利、德国和美利坚合众国的犯罪演变情况。根据2000年联合国人口贩运议定书的定义,人口贩运现象与奴隶制有关,被认为是现代奴隶制。寻找合适的词语来描述这一罪行,仍然是打击人口贩运的一项长期挑战。大多数用来描述人口贩运的说法都侧重于贸易或买卖人口,或者它们的意思更接近于“走私”,特别是与跨境流动有关。这些词,包括英语中的“贩运”一词,可能无法充分反映这种做法最重要的方面:剥削。然而,必须指出的是,在19世纪和20世纪初,今天被认为是人口贩运的做法被称为“白奴”、“奴隶制”和“Madchenhandel”。THB也主要被视为性产业的温床;将强迫劳动、家庭奴役、强迫乞讨等形式的人口贩运排除在当今国际商定的定义之外。随着时间的推移,对(廉价)劳动力、性服务和(强迫)婚姻妇女的需求不断增长,经济和人口差距刺激了人口贩运和走私。犯罪者强迫个人在强迫劳动、奴役或债务奴役的条件下工作;因此,剥夺自由和恶劣的生活条件是对人权的严重侵犯。打击THB的努力主要是针对受害者的支持和预防,作为对受害者严重伤害的回应,但几乎没有采取任何措施来减少这项业务的盈利能力,这就是为什么研究这项业务如何随着时间的推移而发展是有价值的。贩运仍然是一项非常有利可图的生意,贩运者面临的风险相对较小。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信