Platikos and moirikos: Ancient Horoscopic Practice in the Light of Vettius Valens’ Anthologies

Martin Gansten
{"title":"Platikos and moirikos: Ancient Horoscopic Practice in the Light of Vettius Valens’ Anthologies","authors":"Martin Gansten","doi":"10.1163/25899201-12340029","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nFrom the ancient practice, implied by many textual sources although never formally prescribed, of identifying the twelve horoscopic places (the δωδεκάτροπος dōdekatropos) with the zodiacal signs, recent scholarship has often concluded that such identification constituted a tenet of ancient astrology even at a conceptual level. On the basis of a close reading of Vettius Valens’ Anthologies, supported by other ancient sources, this paper argues that while the places, like other elements of horoscopic practice, were often provisionally approximated by sign position alone, calculation of places by degree, with boundaries differing from those of the zodiacal signs, was consistently upheld in principle as more accurate and useful. Specifically, Valens’ preference appears to have been for places calculated from the quadrants formed by the intersections of horizon and meridian, a method also occasionally used in the Anthologies for defining planetary configurations and for annual transmission (παράδοσις paradosis). In several cases, such methods are explicitly employed even for horoscopes presented in a simple, signs-only format.","PeriodicalId":386891,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Divination and Prognostication","volume":"100 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Divination and Prognostication","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/25899201-12340029","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

From the ancient practice, implied by many textual sources although never formally prescribed, of identifying the twelve horoscopic places (the δωδεκάτροπος dōdekatropos) with the zodiacal signs, recent scholarship has often concluded that such identification constituted a tenet of ancient astrology even at a conceptual level. On the basis of a close reading of Vettius Valens’ Anthologies, supported by other ancient sources, this paper argues that while the places, like other elements of horoscopic practice, were often provisionally approximated by sign position alone, calculation of places by degree, with boundaries differing from those of the zodiacal signs, was consistently upheld in principle as more accurate and useful. Specifically, Valens’ preference appears to have been for places calculated from the quadrants formed by the intersections of horizon and meridian, a method also occasionally used in the Anthologies for defining planetary configurations and for annual transmission (παράδοσις paradosis). In several cases, such methods are explicitly employed even for horoscopes presented in a simple, signs-only format.
Platikos和moirikos:在Vettius Valens的选集之光下的古代占星实践
从古代的实践中,虽然没有正式规定,但许多文本来源暗示,用黄道标志识别12个占星术的地方(δωδεκ α τροπος dōdekatropos),最近的学者经常得出结论,这种识别甚至在概念层面上构成了古代占星术的原则。在仔细阅读Vettius Valens的选集的基础上,在其他古代资料的支持下,本文认为,虽然这些地方,就像占星术的其他元素一样,通常只是暂时由星座位置来近似,但按程度计算地方,与黄道标志的边界不同,原则上一直被认为是更准确和有用的。具体来说,瓦伦斯的偏好似乎是根据地平线和子午线相交形成的象限计算出的位置,这种方法也偶尔在《选集》中用于定义行星结构和年度传播(παρ δοσις paradosis)。在一些情况下,这些方法甚至被明确地用于以简单的、只有星座的格式呈现的占星术。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信