Towards a wider uptake of remote sensing in Natura 2000 monitoring: Streamlining remote sensing products with users' needs and expectations

J. Vanden Borre, B. Haest, S. Lang, T. Spanhove, M. Forster, N. Sifakis
{"title":"Towards a wider uptake of remote sensing in Natura 2000 monitoring: Streamlining remote sensing products with users' needs and expectations","authors":"J. Vanden Borre, B. Haest, S. Lang, T. Spanhove, M. Forster, N. Sifakis","doi":"10.1109/ICSPT.2011.6064686","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The implementation of the Habitats Directive (Hab-Dir) in 1992 has been a major step towards a more harmonized approach to nature conservation in the European Union (EU). Member states granted legal protection to habitats and species listed by the HabDir, and designated areas of high nature value as Natura 2000 sites. But legal designation and protection is not enough: sites need to be managed appropriately, and the impacts of environmental pressures working on them require careful monitoring. Furthermore, member states need to monitor the conservation status of habitats and species on their entire territory, and report this to the EU on a six-yearly basis. These reports then serve as input for an assessment at the European scale, aiding the EU to follow up on achievements of the HabDir, and to adapt policy where needed. As a result, this shift towards a more systematic and knowledge-driven approach to biodiversity policy in the EU led to extensive and diverse data needs, at three different scale levels (EU, member state, and protected site) and involving many stakeholders. This can no longer be met by field work alone. Remote sensing image analysis has been demonstrated to be a powerful tool to assist in fulfilling the growing data needs, yet its use in operational Natura 2000 monitoring is still limited. We argue that a successful remote sensing based service for habitat monitoring in the Natura 2000 context should be: (1) multi-scale, (2) versatile, (3) user-friendly, and (4) cost-efficient. The recently started FP7-SPACE project MS. MONINA intends to set the basis for such a service, complying with pan-European efforts for data harmonization and exchange (GMES, INSPIRE, SEIS), and relying on a strong user involvement.","PeriodicalId":376786,"journal":{"name":"2011 2nd International Conference on Space Technology","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-11-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"14","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2011 2nd International Conference on Space Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSPT.2011.6064686","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 14

Abstract

The implementation of the Habitats Directive (Hab-Dir) in 1992 has been a major step towards a more harmonized approach to nature conservation in the European Union (EU). Member states granted legal protection to habitats and species listed by the HabDir, and designated areas of high nature value as Natura 2000 sites. But legal designation and protection is not enough: sites need to be managed appropriately, and the impacts of environmental pressures working on them require careful monitoring. Furthermore, member states need to monitor the conservation status of habitats and species on their entire territory, and report this to the EU on a six-yearly basis. These reports then serve as input for an assessment at the European scale, aiding the EU to follow up on achievements of the HabDir, and to adapt policy where needed. As a result, this shift towards a more systematic and knowledge-driven approach to biodiversity policy in the EU led to extensive and diverse data needs, at three different scale levels (EU, member state, and protected site) and involving many stakeholders. This can no longer be met by field work alone. Remote sensing image analysis has been demonstrated to be a powerful tool to assist in fulfilling the growing data needs, yet its use in operational Natura 2000 monitoring is still limited. We argue that a successful remote sensing based service for habitat monitoring in the Natura 2000 context should be: (1) multi-scale, (2) versatile, (3) user-friendly, and (4) cost-efficient. The recently started FP7-SPACE project MS. MONINA intends to set the basis for such a service, complying with pan-European efforts for data harmonization and exchange (GMES, INSPIRE, SEIS), and relying on a strong user involvement.
在nata 2000监测中更广泛地采用遥感:根据用户的需要和期望精简遥感产品
1992年生境指令(Hab-Dir)的实施是欧洲联盟(欧盟)朝着更统一的自然保护方法迈出的重要一步。各成员国对列入生境目录的生境和物种给予法律保护,并指定具有高自然价值的地区为“自然2000”地点。但是法律上的指定和保护是不够的:遗址需要适当的管理,环境压力对它们的影响需要仔细的监测。此外,成员国需要监测其整个领土上的栖息地和物种的保护状况,并每六年向欧盟报告一次。然后,这些报告作为欧洲范围内评估的输入,帮助欧盟跟进HabDir的成就,并在需要时调整政策。因此,欧盟向更加系统化和知识驱动的生物多样性政策方法的转变导致了三个不同规模水平(欧盟、成员国和受保护地点)的广泛和多样化的数据需求,并涉及许多利益相关者。这已不能单靠实地工作来解决。遥感图像分析已被证明是协助满足日益增长的数据需求的有力工具,但它在实际的Natura 2000监测中的使用仍然有限。我们认为,在Natura 2000背景下,一个成功的基于遥感的栖息地监测服务应该:(1)多尺度,(2)多用途,(3)用户友好,(4)成本效益高。最近启动的FP7-SPACE项目MONINA女士打算为这种服务奠定基础,遵循泛欧数据协调和交换的努力(GMES, INSPIRE, SEIS),并依靠强大的用户参与。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信