Short-Period Seismic Wave Radiation Area and Magnitude of the 1914 Akita-Senboku Earthquake Inferred from Seismic Intensity Data by Comparison with the 1896 Rikuu Earthquake

K. Kanda, M. Takemura
{"title":"Short-Period Seismic Wave Radiation Area and Magnitude of the 1914 Akita-Senboku Earthquake Inferred from Seismic Intensity Data by Comparison with the 1896 Rikuu Earthquake","authors":"K. Kanda, M. Takemura","doi":"10.4294/ZISIN.63.207","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The 1914 Akita-Senboku earthquake was investigated using seismic intensity data estimated from damage records to clarify their magnitudes and source areas related to short-period seismic waves. We evaluated the most appropriate fault model of the Akita-Senboku earthquake on the basis of grid search analysis and other existing research works such as hypocenter distribution of micro earthquakes and S-wave velocity perturbations [Okada et al. (2010)]. The seismic intensity inversion analysis for the Akita-Senboku earthquake assuming an east-dipping fault model (depth: 6-13 km) indicated that the short-period radiation zone was located in the north and deep part of the fault plane and there was a low S-wave velocity zone in the lower crust beneath it. The magnitude of 6.5.6.6 yielded the least evaluation error. The magnitude was also estimated from the area of seismic intensity .ve-lower or more using empirical relationship [Muramatsu (1969)]. It resulted in M=6.6.∼6.7 and reinforced the accuracy of the intensity inversion result. It is concluded that the magnitude of the Akita-Senboku earthquake should be considerably less than M=7.1 after Utsu (1979) even if considering the estimation error. The 1896 Rikuu earthquake was also analyzed to be compared with the Akita-Senboku’s results and to consider their dieffrences. The fault location of the Rikuu earthquake was already identi.ed from surface faults. We assumed two conjugate faults for the northern fault zone of the eastern margin of the Mahiru mountains and the northern fault zone of the eastern margin of the Yokote basin. The most appropriate magnitude was estimated to be M=7.1, which is equivalent to that after Utsu (1979). Therefore, our results indicate that the Rikuu earthquake was considerably larger than the Akita-Senboku earthquake. The short-period radiation zone of the Rikuu earthquake, which might be less accurate due to the lack of intensity data compared to the Akita-Senboku earthquake, was located in shallow zone at the intersection of two conjugate faults. This location contrasts with that of the Akita-Senboku earthquake without surface faults.","PeriodicalId":332254,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Seismological Society of Japan","volume":"208 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-03-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Seismological Society of Japan","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4294/ZISIN.63.207","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

The 1914 Akita-Senboku earthquake was investigated using seismic intensity data estimated from damage records to clarify their magnitudes and source areas related to short-period seismic waves. We evaluated the most appropriate fault model of the Akita-Senboku earthquake on the basis of grid search analysis and other existing research works such as hypocenter distribution of micro earthquakes and S-wave velocity perturbations [Okada et al. (2010)]. The seismic intensity inversion analysis for the Akita-Senboku earthquake assuming an east-dipping fault model (depth: 6-13 km) indicated that the short-period radiation zone was located in the north and deep part of the fault plane and there was a low S-wave velocity zone in the lower crust beneath it. The magnitude of 6.5.6.6 yielded the least evaluation error. The magnitude was also estimated from the area of seismic intensity .ve-lower or more using empirical relationship [Muramatsu (1969)]. It resulted in M=6.6.∼6.7 and reinforced the accuracy of the intensity inversion result. It is concluded that the magnitude of the Akita-Senboku earthquake should be considerably less than M=7.1 after Utsu (1979) even if considering the estimation error. The 1896 Rikuu earthquake was also analyzed to be compared with the Akita-Senboku’s results and to consider their dieffrences. The fault location of the Rikuu earthquake was already identi.ed from surface faults. We assumed two conjugate faults for the northern fault zone of the eastern margin of the Mahiru mountains and the northern fault zone of the eastern margin of the Yokote basin. The most appropriate magnitude was estimated to be M=7.1, which is equivalent to that after Utsu (1979). Therefore, our results indicate that the Rikuu earthquake was considerably larger than the Akita-Senboku earthquake. The short-period radiation zone of the Rikuu earthquake, which might be less accurate due to the lack of intensity data compared to the Akita-Senboku earthquake, was located in shallow zone at the intersection of two conjugate faults. This location contrasts with that of the Akita-Senboku earthquake without surface faults.
从震烈度资料推断1914年秋田地震的短周期地震波辐射面积和震级与1896年陆地地震的比较
利用震害记录估计的地震烈度资料,对1914年秋田-仙保地震进行了调查,以澄清其震级和与短周期地震波有关的震源区域。我们在网格搜索分析的基础上,结合微震震源分布、s波速度摄动等已有研究成果[Okada et al.(2010)],评估了秋田-仙波地震最合适的断层模型。采用东倾断层模型(深度6 ~ 13 km)对秋田—仙部地震进行地震烈度反演分析表明,短周期辐射带位于断面的北部和深部,其下方地壳存在低横波速度带。6.5.6.6的数量级产生的评价误差最小。震级也用经验关系从地震烈度小于或大于0.5的区域估计[Muramatsu(1969)]。结果M=6.6 ~ 6.7,增强了强度反演结果的准确性。结果表明,在Utsu(1979)之后,即使考虑到估计误差,秋田-仙部地震的震级也应大大小于M=7.1级。还分析了1896年的陆陆地震,将其与秋田地震的结果进行了比较,并考虑了它们之间的差异。Rikuu地震的断层位置已经确定。从表面的断层。我们假设马海鲁山东缘北部断裂带和横手盆地东缘北部断裂带为两条共轭断裂。估计最合适的震级为M=7.1级,相当于宇津(1979)之后的震级。因此,我们的研究结果表明,陆地地震比秋田地震大得多。与秋田-仙部地震相比,陆地地震的短周期辐射带由于缺乏强度数据而可能不那么精确,它位于两个共轭断层相交的浅层地带。这个位置与没有地表断层的秋田-仙部地震形成鲜明对比。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信