Hate Speech in Online Polylogues

Manana Rusieshvili-Cartledge, R. Dolidze
{"title":"Hate Speech in Online Polylogues","authors":"Manana Rusieshvili-Cartledge, R. Dolidze","doi":"10.7577/fleks.4171","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nThis research is the first attempt in Georgia to analyse hate speech emerging in Computer-Meditated Communication. Particular attention is paid to the polylogal, asynchronic remarks made by members of the public reacting to online newspaper articles or press releases concerning the LGPT pride event planned for 18 - 23 June 2019, in Tbilisi, Georgia.\n\n\nThe methodology is based on combining methods utilized in CDA and Genre Approach to (im)politeness which is in accord with the general approach to CMDA .\n\n\nAt the first stage of the analysis, the examples of hate-speech acts were analysed according to the following criteria: identification of linguistic means and strategies employed while expressing impoliteness and specificity of identity construction (self-asserted versus others -asserted, positive versus negative, roles of participants and strategies of conflict generation or management). Next, linguistic peculiarities of hate speech (for instance, linguistic triggers [threats, insults, sarcasm incitements], wordplay, taboo, swear and derogatory words, metaphors, allusions and similes) were identified and analysed.\n\n\nQuantitative methodology was employed while stating the number of proponents and opponents of the event as well as statistical data referring to the number of linguistic and politeness strategies employed while expressing an opinion.\n\n\nThis research shows particular tendencies of how impoliteness can be realised and how social identities can be construed using the example of hate discourse concerning LGBT pride\n\n\nin Georgia. However, to fully explore the genre properties of hate discourse in Georgia further research based on examples of hate-discourse strategies applied when discussing ethnic minorities and gender roles, is needed.\n","PeriodicalId":179459,"journal":{"name":"FLEKS - Scandinavian Journal of Intercultural Theory and Practice","volume":"58 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-02-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"FLEKS - Scandinavian Journal of Intercultural Theory and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7577/fleks.4171","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

This research is the first attempt in Georgia to analyse hate speech emerging in Computer-Meditated Communication. Particular attention is paid to the polylogal, asynchronic remarks made by members of the public reacting to online newspaper articles or press releases concerning the LGPT pride event planned for 18 - 23 June 2019, in Tbilisi, Georgia. The methodology is based on combining methods utilized in CDA and Genre Approach to (im)politeness which is in accord with the general approach to CMDA . At the first stage of the analysis, the examples of hate-speech acts were analysed according to the following criteria: identification of linguistic means and strategies employed while expressing impoliteness and specificity of identity construction (self-asserted versus others -asserted, positive versus negative, roles of participants and strategies of conflict generation or management). Next, linguistic peculiarities of hate speech (for instance, linguistic triggers [threats, insults, sarcasm incitements], wordplay, taboo, swear and derogatory words, metaphors, allusions and similes) were identified and analysed. Quantitative methodology was employed while stating the number of proponents and opponents of the event as well as statistical data referring to the number of linguistic and politeness strategies employed while expressing an opinion. This research shows particular tendencies of how impoliteness can be realised and how social identities can be construed using the example of hate discourse concerning LGBT pride in Georgia. However, to fully explore the genre properties of hate discourse in Georgia further research based on examples of hate-discourse strategies applied when discussing ethnic minorities and gender roles, is needed.
网络上的仇恨言论
这项研究是格鲁吉亚首次尝试分析计算机冥想通信中出现的仇恨言论。特别值得注意的是,公众对在线报纸上有关计划于2019年6月18日至23日在格鲁吉亚第比利斯举行的lgbt骄傲活动的文章或新闻稿所发表的多元、非同步的评论。该方法是基于CDA和(im)礼貌的体裁方法相结合的方法,这与CMDA的一般方法是一致的。在分析的第一阶段,仇恨言论行为的例子是根据以下标准进行分析的:识别表达不礼貌时使用的语言手段和策略以及身份建构的特殊性(自我断言与他人断言,积极与消极,参与者的角色以及冲突产生或管理的策略)。其次,仇恨言论的语言特征(例如,语言触发因素[威胁,侮辱,讽刺煽动],文字游戏,禁忌,咒骂和贬损词汇,隐喻,典故和明喻)被识别和分析。在陈述该事件的支持者和反对者的数量以及在表达意见时使用的语言和礼貌策略的数量的统计数据时,采用了定量方法。这项研究显示了不礼貌是如何实现的,以及如何用格鲁吉亚LGBT骄傲的仇恨话语来解释社会身份的特定趋势。然而,要充分挖掘格鲁吉亚仇恨话语的类型特征,还需要进一步研究在讨论少数民族和性别角色时使用的仇恨话语策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信