Comparative analysis of two instructional strategies and their impacts on selected university engineering students' performances in particle technology

Kevon R. McAnuff, S. M. Yalams
{"title":"Comparative analysis of two instructional strategies and their impacts on selected university engineering students' performances in particle technology","authors":"Kevon R. McAnuff, S. M. Yalams","doi":"10.1109/EduCon.2013.6530222","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study examined the effects of active learning and traditional lecturing on the academic performance of Particle Technology students in order to identify the more effective teaching strategy. Two active learning models, namely, cooperative and collaborative learning were used. The population of the study consisted of thirty-eight third year students enrolled in the Bachelor of Engineering in Chemical Engineering program in one of the universities in one of the Caribbean Island. The post-test only control group experimental design was employed for the study while the instruments used to collect data were midterm tests and a final examination. The data collected was subjected to an independent t-test analysis (α = 0.05), using the SPSS statistical software application. The findings indicated that students taught with traditional lecturing performed significantly better (mean P = 0.01) than those taught using active learning strategies. Males and female participants taught with traditional lecturing also performed better than their counterparts taught with active learning. Based on the findings of the study, it was recommended that students be better sensitized about new teaching strategies being implemented, Particle Technology teachers recognize the value of traditional lecturing, appropriate measures be implemented to achieve comparable attendance among study groups and future studies should focus on understanding the characteristics of female students which results in them exhibiting enhanced learning compared to their male counterparts.","PeriodicalId":297233,"journal":{"name":"2013 IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON)","volume":"95 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-03-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2013 IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/EduCon.2013.6530222","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study examined the effects of active learning and traditional lecturing on the academic performance of Particle Technology students in order to identify the more effective teaching strategy. Two active learning models, namely, cooperative and collaborative learning were used. The population of the study consisted of thirty-eight third year students enrolled in the Bachelor of Engineering in Chemical Engineering program in one of the universities in one of the Caribbean Island. The post-test only control group experimental design was employed for the study while the instruments used to collect data were midterm tests and a final examination. The data collected was subjected to an independent t-test analysis (α = 0.05), using the SPSS statistical software application. The findings indicated that students taught with traditional lecturing performed significantly better (mean P = 0.01) than those taught using active learning strategies. Males and female participants taught with traditional lecturing also performed better than their counterparts taught with active learning. Based on the findings of the study, it was recommended that students be better sensitized about new teaching strategies being implemented, Particle Technology teachers recognize the value of traditional lecturing, appropriate measures be implemented to achieve comparable attendance among study groups and future studies should focus on understanding the characteristics of female students which results in them exhibiting enhanced learning compared to their male counterparts.
两种教学策略的比较分析及其对所选工科学生粒子技术成绩的影响
本研究旨在探讨主动学习与传统教学对粒子科技学生学习成绩的影响,以找出更有效的教学策略。采用合作学习和协作学习两种主动学习模式。该研究的人群包括38名在加勒比海岛屿上的一所大学就读化学工程学士学位课程的三年级学生。本研究采用测试后仅对照组实验设计,收集资料的工具为期中测试和期末考试。采用SPSS统计软件对收集的数据进行独立t检验分析(α = 0.05)。结果表明,采用传统教学的学生表现显著优于采用主动学习策略的学生(平均P = 0.01)。接受传统教学的男性和女性参与者也比接受主动学习的参与者表现得更好。根据研究结果,建议学生更好地了解正在实施的新教学策略,粒子技术教师认识到传统教学的价值,采取适当的措施实现小组间的同等出勤率,未来的研究应侧重于了解女学生的特征,从而使她们比男学生表现出更好的学习效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信