Budget in the Cloud: Analyzing Cost and Recommending Virtual Machine Workload

Brian Zhang, Valencia Zhang, Michael Hum
{"title":"Budget in the Cloud: Analyzing Cost and Recommending Virtual Machine Workload","authors":"Brian Zhang, Valencia Zhang, Michael Hum","doi":"10.1109/CECCC56460.2022.10069750","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Due to the increasing popularity of cloud computing, the cost companies pay to use the cloud and its services are growing significantly. Higher costs of cloud computing technology contribute to the volatility of the cloud and the financial instability of companies that depend on the cloud. Companies have their own unique cloud budget, and staying within that budget can become problematic in light of increasing costs. To save cost, many cloud users look to their cloud provider rather than looking at their own cloud purchases. A lack of studies on cloud users’ virtual machine (VM) workload and how cloud users spend money necessitates analysis of the spending of cloud customers. In this research paper, we analyzed a real-world data set from Microsoft Azure collected in 2019 that includes approximately 2.7 million VM traces. We developed a linear regression based pricing model to calculate the cost and used this model to analyze Microsoft Azure’s VM workload by comparing the cores, memory, lifetime, average utilization, and cost of each trace. By analyzing Microsoft’s data, we observed that users are not fully utilizing the cloud resources they have paid for. With this idea in mind, we then quantified the waste and developed an algorithm to determine which VMs are the most ineffective. We applied our algorithm to Microsoft Azure’s data set, and our results show that our algorithm discovered over one million wasteful VMs and helped 6,600 users save $3.3 million dollars. Even though cloud computing prices are increasing, cloud customers can save significantly by understanding VM workload better and selecting better-fitting VMs.","PeriodicalId":155272,"journal":{"name":"2022 International Communication Engineering and Cloud Computing Conference (CECCC)","volume":"56 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2022 International Communication Engineering and Cloud Computing Conference (CECCC)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/CECCC56460.2022.10069750","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Due to the increasing popularity of cloud computing, the cost companies pay to use the cloud and its services are growing significantly. Higher costs of cloud computing technology contribute to the volatility of the cloud and the financial instability of companies that depend on the cloud. Companies have their own unique cloud budget, and staying within that budget can become problematic in light of increasing costs. To save cost, many cloud users look to their cloud provider rather than looking at their own cloud purchases. A lack of studies on cloud users’ virtual machine (VM) workload and how cloud users spend money necessitates analysis of the spending of cloud customers. In this research paper, we analyzed a real-world data set from Microsoft Azure collected in 2019 that includes approximately 2.7 million VM traces. We developed a linear regression based pricing model to calculate the cost and used this model to analyze Microsoft Azure’s VM workload by comparing the cores, memory, lifetime, average utilization, and cost of each trace. By analyzing Microsoft’s data, we observed that users are not fully utilizing the cloud resources they have paid for. With this idea in mind, we then quantified the waste and developed an algorithm to determine which VMs are the most ineffective. We applied our algorithm to Microsoft Azure’s data set, and our results show that our algorithm discovered over one million wasteful VMs and helped 6,600 users save $3.3 million dollars. Even though cloud computing prices are increasing, cloud customers can save significantly by understanding VM workload better and selecting better-fitting VMs.
云中的预算:分析成本和推荐虚拟机工作负载
由于云计算的日益普及,公司为使用云计算及其服务而支付的成本正在显著增长。云计算技术的较高成本导致了云的波动性和依赖云的公司的财务不稳定。公司有自己独特的云预算,考虑到成本的增加,保持在预算范围内可能会成为问题。为了节省成本,许多云用户向他们的云提供商寻求帮助,而不是自己购买云服务。由于缺乏对云用户的虚拟机(VM)工作负载以及云用户如何花钱的研究,因此有必要对云客户的支出进行分析。在这篇研究论文中,我们分析了2019年从微软Azure收集的真实数据集,其中包括大约270万个虚拟机痕迹。我们开发了一个基于线性回归的定价模型来计算成本,并使用该模型通过比较每个跟踪的内核、内存、生命周期、平均利用率和成本来分析Microsoft Azure的VM工作负载。通过分析微软的数据,我们发现用户并没有充分利用他们所购买的云资源。考虑到这个想法,我们量化了浪费,并开发了一种算法来确定哪些vm是最无效的。我们将我们的算法应用于微软Azure的数据集,结果显示我们的算法发现了超过100万个浪费的vm,帮助6600个用户节省了330万美元。尽管云计算的价格在不断上涨,但云计算客户可以通过更好地了解VM工作负载并选择更合适的VM来节省大量费用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信