How Do Dealers in Government Bond Markets Manage Their Spot Risk with Derivatives? Evidence from London

Narayan Naik, P. Yadav
{"title":"How Do Dealers in Government Bond Markets Manage Their Spot Risk with Derivatives? Evidence from London","authors":"Narayan Naik, P. Yadav","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.214609","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Using a comprehensive data-set from the Bank of England containing the close-of-business positions of individual UK government bond dealers in each bond issue and in all related futures contracts, we examine how the dealers use futures markets to manage the risk of their spot portfolio. We find that the size of dealers' positions in futures contracts is comparable in magnitude to their positions in the spot market, and that the dealers take on significant directional risks often by holding futures that are in the same direction as the spot. Although, in general, the dealers do not seem to use futures to reduce the level of their spot risk, we so find that they actively use futures to offset the changes in the levels of their spot risk. However, this offset is partial in most cases. They use futures to offset changes in their spot exposure to a greater extent when the bonds they hold in their portfolio are more efficiently hedgeable with futures contracts, and on days when the cost of offsetting (as measured by the predictable change in futures mispricing) is lower. They also offset more when the level of their spot risk is high and when recent changes in the spot risk are in a direction that exacerbates their spot risk exposure (i.e., when the potential costs of regulatory distress are high). Finally, we observe that dealers offset changes in their spot exposure to a greater extent immediately prior to important macroeconomic announcements and to a lesser extent immediately thereafter.","PeriodicalId":192327,"journal":{"name":"EFA 2000 London Meetings (Archive)","volume":"466 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2000-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EFA 2000 London Meetings (Archive)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.214609","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Using a comprehensive data-set from the Bank of England containing the close-of-business positions of individual UK government bond dealers in each bond issue and in all related futures contracts, we examine how the dealers use futures markets to manage the risk of their spot portfolio. We find that the size of dealers' positions in futures contracts is comparable in magnitude to their positions in the spot market, and that the dealers take on significant directional risks often by holding futures that are in the same direction as the spot. Although, in general, the dealers do not seem to use futures to reduce the level of their spot risk, we so find that they actively use futures to offset the changes in the levels of their spot risk. However, this offset is partial in most cases. They use futures to offset changes in their spot exposure to a greater extent when the bonds they hold in their portfolio are more efficiently hedgeable with futures contracts, and on days when the cost of offsetting (as measured by the predictable change in futures mispricing) is lower. They also offset more when the level of their spot risk is high and when recent changes in the spot risk are in a direction that exacerbates their spot risk exposure (i.e., when the potential costs of regulatory distress are high). Finally, we observe that dealers offset changes in their spot exposure to a greater extent immediately prior to important macroeconomic announcements and to a lesser extent immediately thereafter.
政府债券市场的交易商如何利用衍生品管理现货风险?来自伦敦的证据
使用来自英格兰银行的综合数据集,其中包含每个英国政府债券交易商在每次债券发行和所有相关期货合约中的收盘头寸,我们研究了交易商如何使用期货市场来管理其现货投资组合的风险。我们发现,交易商在期货合约中的头寸规模与其在现货市场的头寸规模相当,并且交易商通常通过持有与现货相同方向的期货而承担重大的方向性风险。尽管总体而言,交易商似乎没有利用期货来降低其现货风险水平,但我们发现他们积极利用期货来抵消其现货风险水平的变化。然而,在大多数情况下,这种抵消是部分的。当他们在投资组合中持有的债券可以更有效地用期货合约对冲时,以及在抵消成本(以期货错误定价的可预测变化来衡量)较低的日子里,他们利用期货来更大程度地抵消其现货敞口的变化。当他们的现货风险水平较高,以及近期现货风险的变化加剧了他们的现货风险敞口时(即,当监管压力的潜在成本很高时),他们也会抵消更多。最后,我们观察到,交易商在重要宏观经济公告发布之前,更大程度上抵消了其现货敞口的变化,而在公告发布之后,抵消的幅度较小。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信