Analyzing the Impact of User Behaviors on the Popularity of Tweets: A Use Case from Masking Conversations During the Covid-19 Pandemic

Julia Warnken, S. Gokhale
{"title":"Analyzing the Impact of User Behaviors on the Popularity of Tweets: A Use Case from Masking Conversations During the Covid-19 Pandemic","authors":"Julia Warnken, S. Gokhale","doi":"10.1145/3582768.3582779","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Covid-19 pandemic has unleashed an infodemic of misinformation especially about important health measures such as vaccines and masks. Social media companies have struggled to keep up with identifying content that separates these falsehoods from the volumes of information that is shared over their platforms. Because automated detection approaches can only reach moderate accuracy (∼80%), some manual examination of the content to separate misinformation becomes necessary. This manual assessment can be efficient if it is limited to only those posts that are likely to be successful in gaining popularity. Predicting the future popularity of posts is certainly a function of their content, but it also depends on the actions of the users. In this paper, we analyze which users’ actions are significantly correlated with the popularity of their tweets, where the popularity is assessed using the numbers of likes and retweets. The investigation is conducted on a year-long data gathered by sampling Twitter conversations on the controversial issue of face masks during the acute, first year of the pandemic. User parameters are grouped into two – those that involve including various artifacts in the tweets to boost their popularity, and those that represent how users interact with other users and their content. After providing the context by which these short- and long-term actions build social relationships which help drive popularity, Pearson's correlation coefficients between these parameters and the numbers of likes and retweets are computed, along with their statistical significance. Our results indicate that the artifacts that users incorporate into their tweets including hashtags, mentions, URLs, and media have no significant influence on their popularity compared to how they interact with other users. Moreover, users may like other users’ tweets when they share follower-followee (impersonal) relationships, but they look for stronger, trusted friendships to actively retweet other users’ content. Thus, “liking” a tweet may be considered a much more casual endorsement compared to “retweeting”. These findings contradict observations from the pre-Covid era, perhaps suggesting that online behaviors during the pandemic may have altered fundamentally, underscoring the need for further research.","PeriodicalId":315721,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 2022 6th International Conference on Natural Language Processing and Information Retrieval","volume":"51 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 2022 6th International Conference on Natural Language Processing and Information Retrieval","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3582768.3582779","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The Covid-19 pandemic has unleashed an infodemic of misinformation especially about important health measures such as vaccines and masks. Social media companies have struggled to keep up with identifying content that separates these falsehoods from the volumes of information that is shared over their platforms. Because automated detection approaches can only reach moderate accuracy (∼80%), some manual examination of the content to separate misinformation becomes necessary. This manual assessment can be efficient if it is limited to only those posts that are likely to be successful in gaining popularity. Predicting the future popularity of posts is certainly a function of their content, but it also depends on the actions of the users. In this paper, we analyze which users’ actions are significantly correlated with the popularity of their tweets, where the popularity is assessed using the numbers of likes and retweets. The investigation is conducted on a year-long data gathered by sampling Twitter conversations on the controversial issue of face masks during the acute, first year of the pandemic. User parameters are grouped into two – those that involve including various artifacts in the tweets to boost their popularity, and those that represent how users interact with other users and their content. After providing the context by which these short- and long-term actions build social relationships which help drive popularity, Pearson's correlation coefficients between these parameters and the numbers of likes and retweets are computed, along with their statistical significance. Our results indicate that the artifacts that users incorporate into their tweets including hashtags, mentions, URLs, and media have no significant influence on their popularity compared to how they interact with other users. Moreover, users may like other users’ tweets when they share follower-followee (impersonal) relationships, but they look for stronger, trusted friendships to actively retweet other users’ content. Thus, “liking” a tweet may be considered a much more casual endorsement compared to “retweeting”. These findings contradict observations from the pre-Covid era, perhaps suggesting that online behaviors during the pandemic may have altered fundamentally, underscoring the need for further research.
分析用户行为对推文受欢迎程度的影响:在Covid-19大流行期间屏蔽对话的用例
Covid-19大流行引发了大量错误信息,特别是关于疫苗和口罩等重要卫生措施的错误信息。社交媒体公司一直在努力识别将这些虚假信息与通过其平台共享的大量信息区分开来的内容。由于自动检测方法只能达到中等准确度(约80%),因此需要对内容进行一些人工检查以分离错误信息。如果这种人工评估仅限于那些可能成功地获得人气的帖子,它可能是有效的。预测帖子未来的受欢迎程度当然是其内容的一个功能,但它也取决于用户的行为。在本文中,我们分析了哪些用户的行为与其推文的受欢迎程度显著相关,其中受欢迎程度是通过点赞和转发的数量来评估的。这项调查是根据为期一年的数据进行的,这些数据是通过抽样Twitter上关于口罩这一有争议问题的对话收集的,这些对话是在大流行的急性第一年进行的。用户参数被分为两类:一类是在推文中加入各种人工制品以提高其受欢迎程度,另一类是代表用户如何与其他用户及其内容进行交互。在提供了这些短期和长期行为建立社会关系的背景(这些关系有助于推动人气)之后,计算这些参数与点赞和转发数量之间的Pearson相关系数,以及它们的统计显著性。我们的研究结果表明,与用户与其他用户互动的方式相比,用户在其推文中包含的工件(包括标签、提及、url和媒体)对其受欢迎程度没有显著影响。此外,当用户分享关注者与关注者(非个人)的关系时,他们可能会喜欢其他用户的推文,但他们会寻找更牢固、更值得信任的友谊来积极转发其他用户的内容。因此,与“转发”相比,“喜欢”一条推文可能被认为是一种更随意的认可。这些发现与covid前时代的观察结果相矛盾,可能表明大流行期间的在线行为可能发生了根本变化,强调了进一步研究的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信