{"title":"Learning about Learning in Jewish Education","authors":"A. Kelman","doi":"10.1515/9781618117540-004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"n this chapter, Kelman begins with a critique of Jewish educational researchers’ rel-ative neglect of learning processes, and points his readers to the work of Lave and Wenger as a framework for understanding Jewish learning and its outcomes. He suggests five directions that emerge from Lave and Wenger’s sociocultural learning theory: learning about and from a variety of “experts” in realms of Jewish activity or engagement; deep examination of the way learning happens in different Jewish educational settings; exploration of the broader ecology of Jewish learning; a focus on technology and Jewish learning; and the way in which “non-Jewish Jews” learn about Jewish communal participation. Through charting these directions, Kelman builds his case for the importance of greater attention to Jewish learning as a focus for Jewish educational research.","PeriodicalId":136992,"journal":{"name":"Advancing the Learning Agenda in Jewish Education","volume":"21 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advancing the Learning Agenda in Jewish Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/9781618117540-004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
Abstract
n this chapter, Kelman begins with a critique of Jewish educational researchers’ rel-ative neglect of learning processes, and points his readers to the work of Lave and Wenger as a framework for understanding Jewish learning and its outcomes. He suggests five directions that emerge from Lave and Wenger’s sociocultural learning theory: learning about and from a variety of “experts” in realms of Jewish activity or engagement; deep examination of the way learning happens in different Jewish educational settings; exploration of the broader ecology of Jewish learning; a focus on technology and Jewish learning; and the way in which “non-Jewish Jews” learn about Jewish communal participation. Through charting these directions, Kelman builds his case for the importance of greater attention to Jewish learning as a focus for Jewish educational research.