The Differences of Learning Achievement of Vein Puncture Using Mannequin Learning Objects and Real Patients

L. Rosita, Mahdea Kasyiva, Ester Tri Rahayu
{"title":"The Differences of Learning Achievement of Vein Puncture Using Mannequin Learning Objects and Real Patients","authors":"L. Rosita, Mahdea Kasyiva, Ester Tri Rahayu","doi":"10.2991/assehr.k.210930.035","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Clinical competence is a mandatory requirement in medical education. The learning form of clinical competence is the skills lab. This learning activity uses tools that resemble the actual conditions of the patient. This study aims to compare the effectivity of learning venous puncture using mannequin and real patients based on students’ perception. Method: This research is an observational-cross sectional study, with one-time data collection process, by filling out a questionnaire. The research subjects were young doctors who had undergone the clinical laboratory stage. The research location is the hospital partner of Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Islam Indonesia (Regional Public Hospital of Kebumen and PDHI Hospital). Respondents filled out a questionnaire that can be accessed online. Data is then analysed for the differences with the T-Test. Result: The T-Test analysis shows that p-value = 0.006 on clinical knowledge using mannequin learning objects and real patients. These results indicate that students’s perceptions of clinical knowledge of venous puncture using real patients are better than using mannequins. Meanwhile, there was no significant difference in the clinical skills of venous puncture using mannequins and real patients, p value = 0.684. Conclusion: Based on students' perception, there are differences in the achievement of clinical knowledge in learning venous puncture using mannequin learning objects and real patients.","PeriodicalId":239200,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the International Conference on Medical Education (ICME 2021)","volume":"85 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the International Conference on Medical Education (ICME 2021)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.210930.035","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Clinical competence is a mandatory requirement in medical education. The learning form of clinical competence is the skills lab. This learning activity uses tools that resemble the actual conditions of the patient. This study aims to compare the effectivity of learning venous puncture using mannequin and real patients based on students’ perception. Method: This research is an observational-cross sectional study, with one-time data collection process, by filling out a questionnaire. The research subjects were young doctors who had undergone the clinical laboratory stage. The research location is the hospital partner of Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Islam Indonesia (Regional Public Hospital of Kebumen and PDHI Hospital). Respondents filled out a questionnaire that can be accessed online. Data is then analysed for the differences with the T-Test. Result: The T-Test analysis shows that p-value = 0.006 on clinical knowledge using mannequin learning objects and real patients. These results indicate that students’s perceptions of clinical knowledge of venous puncture using real patients are better than using mannequins. Meanwhile, there was no significant difference in the clinical skills of venous puncture using mannequins and real patients, p value = 0.684. Conclusion: Based on students' perception, there are differences in the achievement of clinical knowledge in learning venous puncture using mannequin learning objects and real patients.
假人学习对象与真实患者静脉穿刺学习效果的差异
背景:临床能力是医学教育的必备条件。临床能力的学习形式是技能实验室。这种学习活动使用的工具类似于病人的实际情况。本研究旨在根据学生的感知,比较假人与真实患者学习静脉穿刺的效果。方法:本研究采用观察式横断面研究,采用一次性数据收集方法,采用问卷调查的方式。研究对象为已完成临床检验阶段的年轻医生。研究地点是印度尼西亚伊斯兰大学医学院(Kebumen地区公立医院和PDHI医院)的医院合作伙伴。受访者填写了一份可以在线访问的调查问卷。然后分析数据与t检验的差异。结果:t检验分析显示,使用模型学习对象和真实患者的临床知识p值= 0.006。这些结果表明,学生对使用真实患者静脉穿刺的临床知识的认知优于使用人体模型。同时,人体模型与真实患者静脉穿刺的临床技能差异无统计学意义,p值= 0.684。结论:基于学生的感知,使用假体学习对象和真实患者学习静脉穿刺在临床知识的获取上存在差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信