Measuring Institutional Trading Costs and the Implications for Finance Research: The Case of Tick Size Reductions

Gregory W. Eaton, Paul Irvine, Tingting Liu
{"title":"Measuring Institutional Trading Costs and the Implications for Finance Research: The Case of Tick Size Reductions","authors":"Gregory W. Eaton, Paul Irvine, Tingting Liu","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3255735","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Using proprietary institutional trade data, we construct a price impact measure that represents the costs faced by institutional investors. We show that many widely used liquidity measures do not adequately capture institutional trading costs. We then find that institutional trading costs are not dramatically impacted by decimalization, casting doubt on the widely used identification strategy that employs decimalization as an exogenous shock to liquidity, particularly institutional liquidity. Indeed, we find that conclusions from prior research are significantly altered when we measure liquidity using institutional trading data.","PeriodicalId":330992,"journal":{"name":"New Institutional Economics eJournal","volume":"3 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"19","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"New Institutional Economics eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3255735","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 19

Abstract

Abstract Using proprietary institutional trade data, we construct a price impact measure that represents the costs faced by institutional investors. We show that many widely used liquidity measures do not adequately capture institutional trading costs. We then find that institutional trading costs are not dramatically impacted by decimalization, casting doubt on the widely used identification strategy that employs decimalization as an exogenous shock to liquidity, particularly institutional liquidity. Indeed, we find that conclusions from prior research are significantly altered when we measure liquidity using institutional trading data.
衡量机构交易成本及其对金融研究的启示:以交易规模缩减为例
摘要本文利用专有机构交易数据,构建了一个代表机构投资者所面临成本的价格影响测度。我们表明,许多广泛使用的流动性措施不能充分反映机构交易成本。然后,我们发现机构交易成本并没有受到十进制的显著影响,这使人们对广泛使用的识别策略产生了怀疑,该策略将十进制作为对流动性,特别是机构流动性的外生冲击。事实上,我们发现,当我们使用机构交易数据衡量流动性时,先前研究的结论会发生显著改变。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信