ICU Outcomes in Patients with Covid-19 Associated ARDS: A Retrospective Analysis

C. Vahdatpour, S. D. Young, J. Ayyoub, J. Jaber, Psom Data Investigators, O. Nwankwo, P. Kinniry
{"title":"ICU Outcomes in Patients with Covid-19 Associated ARDS: A Retrospective Analysis","authors":"C. Vahdatpour, S. D. Young, J. Ayyoub, J. Jaber, Psom Data Investigators, O. Nwankwo, P. Kinniry","doi":"10.1164/AJRCCM-CONFERENCE.2021.203.1_MEETINGABSTRACTS.A2554","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) management in the intensive care unit (ICU) has been debated since the start of the Covid-19 pandemic. Our study aims to describe the outcomes and predictors of mortality of ARDS associated with Covid-19 within one university-based healthcare system. Methods: This was a retrospective study performed within one university-based healthcare system. An electronic medical record was used to identify 166 patients admitted to the ICU for ARDS in the setting of SARS-CoV-2 infection at three different hospitals. Baseline patient characteristics, ICU and hospital course information, ICU interventions, ventilator settings, and hospital complications were collected and analyzed using descriptive statistical techniques. Results: The 166 patients meeting inclusion criteria had an average age of 64.1 (± 14.8). No significant difference in mortality was identified with male vs. female gender (57.9% vs. 42.1%, p=0.852) or BMI (8.4 ± 0.9 vs. 12.1 ± 1.5, p=0.727). The majority of the patient cohort was identified as black (68.2%). The overall mortality of our cohort was 38.2%. Hyperlipidemia (p=0.011), coronary artery disease (0.034), and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (p=0.006) were all associated with higher mortality. Prone positioning was utilized in 42.8% of all patients, and ECMO in 6.0%. There was a significant difference of mortality between those with higher observed ventilator plateau pressures at 24 hours (25.7 vs. 23.1, p=0.010) and driving pressures at 24 hours (13.4 vs. 11.7, p=0.036). Conclusion: Covid-19 associated ARDS is associated with significant mortality. Physicians should be aware of pre-existing conditions that are potentially associated with worse outcomes so that they receive appropriate level of care in a timely manner. Lower plateau and driving pressures were associated with improved outcomes. Prospective studies are needed to guide Covid-19 associated ARDS management.","PeriodicalId":111156,"journal":{"name":"TP49. TP049 COVID: ARDS AND ICU MANAGEMENT","volume":"2015 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"TP49. TP049 COVID: ARDS AND ICU MANAGEMENT","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1164/AJRCCM-CONFERENCE.2021.203.1_MEETINGABSTRACTS.A2554","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) management in the intensive care unit (ICU) has been debated since the start of the Covid-19 pandemic. Our study aims to describe the outcomes and predictors of mortality of ARDS associated with Covid-19 within one university-based healthcare system. Methods: This was a retrospective study performed within one university-based healthcare system. An electronic medical record was used to identify 166 patients admitted to the ICU for ARDS in the setting of SARS-CoV-2 infection at three different hospitals. Baseline patient characteristics, ICU and hospital course information, ICU interventions, ventilator settings, and hospital complications were collected and analyzed using descriptive statistical techniques. Results: The 166 patients meeting inclusion criteria had an average age of 64.1 (± 14.8). No significant difference in mortality was identified with male vs. female gender (57.9% vs. 42.1%, p=0.852) or BMI (8.4 ± 0.9 vs. 12.1 ± 1.5, p=0.727). The majority of the patient cohort was identified as black (68.2%). The overall mortality of our cohort was 38.2%. Hyperlipidemia (p=0.011), coronary artery disease (0.034), and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (p=0.006) were all associated with higher mortality. Prone positioning was utilized in 42.8% of all patients, and ECMO in 6.0%. There was a significant difference of mortality between those with higher observed ventilator plateau pressures at 24 hours (25.7 vs. 23.1, p=0.010) and driving pressures at 24 hours (13.4 vs. 11.7, p=0.036). Conclusion: Covid-19 associated ARDS is associated with significant mortality. Physicians should be aware of pre-existing conditions that are potentially associated with worse outcomes so that they receive appropriate level of care in a timely manner. Lower plateau and driving pressures were associated with improved outcomes. Prospective studies are needed to guide Covid-19 associated ARDS management.
Covid-19相关ARDS患者ICU预后的回顾性分析
自Covid-19大流行开始以来,重症监护病房(ICU)的急性呼吸窘迫综合征(ARDS)管理一直存在争议。我们的研究旨在描述一所大学医疗系统中与Covid-19相关的ARDS死亡率的结果和预测因素。方法:这是一项在一所大学医疗保健系统中进行的回顾性研究。使用电子病历对3家不同医院因SARS-CoV-2感染而入住ICU的166例ARDS患者进行了鉴定。使用描述性统计技术收集和分析基线患者特征、ICU和医院病程信息、ICU干预措施、呼吸机设置和医院并发症。结果:符合入选标准的166例患者,平均年龄64.1岁(±14.8岁)。男女死亡率无显著差异(57.9%比42.1%,p=0.852), BMI(8.4±0.9比12.1±1.5,p=0.727)。大多数患者队列为黑人(68.2%)。我们队列的总死亡率为38.2%。高脂血症(p=0.011)、冠状动脉疾病(0.034)和慢性阻塞性肺疾病(p=0.006)均与较高的死亡率相关。42.8%的患者采用俯卧位,6.0%采用ECMO。24小时呼吸机平台压力较高组(25.7 vs. 23.1, p=0.010)与24小时驾驶压力较高组(13.4 vs. 11.7, p=0.036)死亡率差异有统计学意义。结论:Covid-19相关ARDS与显著死亡率相关。医生应该意识到已有的疾病可能会导致更糟糕的结果,以便他们及时得到适当的护理。较低的平台压力和驱动压力与改善的结果相关。需要前瞻性研究来指导Covid-19相关的ARDS管理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信