New evidence for melodic speech in Autism Spectrum Disorder

Simon Wehrle, F. Cangemi, K. Vogeley, M. Grice
{"title":"New evidence for melodic speech in Autism Spectrum Disorder","authors":"Simon Wehrle, F. Cangemi, K. Vogeley, M. Grice","doi":"10.21437/speechprosody.2022-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Since the very beginnings of research into Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD), there have been contradicting descriptions of speech in ASD as being “singsongy” or melodic on the one hand and “robotic” or monotonous on the other. We highlight some issues regarding the terminology and methodologies used in previous studies as well as their comparability, concluding that previous accounts, particularly of monotonous speech in ASD, may have been misleading. We expand on a previous pilot study in using the same method of quantifying the spaciousness and liveliness of speech along two dimensions in order to analyse an extended data set (~ 5 hours) of semi-spontaneous conversations. We compare 14 German adults diagnosed with ASD and 14 matched control speakers (CTR), recorded in disposition-matched dyads (ASD-ASD; CTR-CTR). Using Bayesian modelling, we present evidence that most (but not all) ASD speakers in our corpus produced a more melodic intonation style than non-autistic CTR speakers, while, crucially, none produced a more monotonous intonation style. We emphasise the importance of inter-individual variability in groups of autistic speakers and point out that our results align with a clear tendency in recent studies to report more melodic speech in ASD.","PeriodicalId":442842,"journal":{"name":"Speech Prosody 2022","volume":"48 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Speech Prosody 2022","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21437/speechprosody.2022-8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Since the very beginnings of research into Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD), there have been contradicting descriptions of speech in ASD as being “singsongy” or melodic on the one hand and “robotic” or monotonous on the other. We highlight some issues regarding the terminology and methodologies used in previous studies as well as their comparability, concluding that previous accounts, particularly of monotonous speech in ASD, may have been misleading. We expand on a previous pilot study in using the same method of quantifying the spaciousness and liveliness of speech along two dimensions in order to analyse an extended data set (~ 5 hours) of semi-spontaneous conversations. We compare 14 German adults diagnosed with ASD and 14 matched control speakers (CTR), recorded in disposition-matched dyads (ASD-ASD; CTR-CTR). Using Bayesian modelling, we present evidence that most (but not all) ASD speakers in our corpus produced a more melodic intonation style than non-autistic CTR speakers, while, crucially, none produced a more monotonous intonation style. We emphasise the importance of inter-individual variability in groups of autistic speakers and point out that our results align with a clear tendency in recent studies to report more melodic speech in ASD.
自闭症谱系障碍中旋律语言的新证据
自从对自闭症谱系障碍(ASD)的研究开始以来,对ASD的语言的描述就一直存在矛盾,一方面是“歌唱”或旋律优美,另一方面是“机器人”或单调。我们强调了以前研究中使用的术语和方法的一些问题,以及它们的可比性,结论是以前的描述,特别是ASD中单调的语言,可能具有误导性。为了分析半自发对话的扩展数据集(约5小时),我们扩展了先前的试点研究,使用相同的方法沿着两个维度量化语音的空间和活泼度。我们比较了14名诊断为ASD的德国成年人和14名匹配的对照说话者(CTR),他们记录在性格匹配的双染色体组(ASD-ASD;CTR-CTR)。使用贝叶斯模型,我们提供的证据表明,在我们的语料库中,大多数(但不是全部)ASD说话者比非自闭症CTR说话者产生了更有旋律的语调风格,而至关重要的是,没有人产生更单调的语调风格。我们强调自闭症说话者群体中个体间差异的重要性,并指出我们的结果与最近研究中报道的ASD中旋律性语言的明显趋势一致。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信