The strange monumentality of some artworks or something

B. Fitton
{"title":"The strange monumentality of some artworks or something","authors":"B. Fitton","doi":"10.1386/aps_00049_1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article investigates the idea that sometimes artworks become strange monuments: occasionally to themselves. It begins with an overview of how various artworks have taken on aspects of monumentality, setting up a number of coordinates for thought – energy, appropriation, fiction, resurrection and so on. It then turns to the contested status of Rachel Whiteread’s House (1993), paying attention to the ways in which its potential to endure as a conventional public monument was denied, leaving behind a strange set of digital monuments in its afterlife. It goes on to contrast the tomb-like preservation of Roger Hiorns’ Seizure ([2008] 2013) at the Yorkshire Sculpture Park with the rhetoric surrounding its initial staging in Southwark. This logic of preservation is compared with how Thomas Hirschhorn has revisited his early monument works, and his claims regarding their eternal life.","PeriodicalId":311280,"journal":{"name":"Art & the Public Sphere","volume":"101 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Art & the Public Sphere","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1386/aps_00049_1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article investigates the idea that sometimes artworks become strange monuments: occasionally to themselves. It begins with an overview of how various artworks have taken on aspects of monumentality, setting up a number of coordinates for thought – energy, appropriation, fiction, resurrection and so on. It then turns to the contested status of Rachel Whiteread’s House (1993), paying attention to the ways in which its potential to endure as a conventional public monument was denied, leaving behind a strange set of digital monuments in its afterlife. It goes on to contrast the tomb-like preservation of Roger Hiorns’ Seizure ([2008] 2013) at the Yorkshire Sculpture Park with the rhetoric surrounding its initial staging in Southwark. This logic of preservation is compared with how Thomas Hirschhorn has revisited his early monument works, and his claims regarding their eternal life.
一些艺术品或其他东西的奇怪纪念性
这篇文章调查了艺术品有时会成为奇怪的纪念碑的想法:偶尔对它们自己来说。它首先概述了各种艺术作品是如何呈现出纪念性的,并为思想建立了一系列坐标——能量、挪用、虚构、复活等等。然后,它转向了蕾切尔·怀特里德(Rachel Whiteread)的住宅(1993)备受争议的地位,关注它作为传统公共纪念碑的潜力被剥夺的方式,在它的死后留下了一组奇怪的数字纪念碑。它继续将约克郡雕塑公园中Roger Hiorns的《癫痫》([2008]2013)的坟墓般的保存与围绕其在萨瑟克最初阶段的修辞进行对比。这种保存的逻辑与托马斯·赫施霍恩如何重新审视他早期的纪念碑作品,以及他关于它们永恒生命的主张进行了比较。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信