Euthanasia Complications in Non-Domestic Species

Caitlin Hepps Keeney, T. Harrison
{"title":"Euthanasia Complications in Non-Domestic Species","authors":"Caitlin Hepps Keeney, T. Harrison","doi":"10.3390/jzbg3040045","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"There are very few studies describing euthanasia complications in non-domestic species. The goal of this study was to survey veterinarians to determine what complications may commonly occur during the euthanasia of non-domestic species. An online survey was sent to seven professional organization listservs containing veterinarians most likely to practice on non-domestic species. Forty-one cases of euthanasia complications were reported. The most common taxa reported were mammals, (23/41, 56%), followed by avian (8/41, 20%), reptile (7/41, 17%), and fish (3/41, 7%). Most animals were reported to have been anesthetized prior to euthanasia (28/41, 68%). The most common method of euthanasia was pentobarbital (27/41, 66%). The reported euthanasia complications included “took an excessive amount of euthanasia solution” (12/41, 29%), “heart would not stop” (9/41, 22%), “animal awoke at a later time” (4/41, 10%), “a secondary method of euthanasia was required” (4/41, 10%), and “other” (12/41, 29%). This study reports complications that can occur during the euthanasia of non-domestic species. The concept of dysthanasia, a euthanasia with an undesirable outcome, has not been previously discussed in the context of zoo, wildlife, aquarium, and exotic pet practice. Strategies to reduce dysthanasia from both animal and human perspectives are explored, including alternative euthanasia techniques, principal-based euthanasia, and mental health implications.","PeriodicalId":228608,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Zoological and Botanical Gardens","volume":"35 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Zoological and Botanical Gardens","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/jzbg3040045","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

There are very few studies describing euthanasia complications in non-domestic species. The goal of this study was to survey veterinarians to determine what complications may commonly occur during the euthanasia of non-domestic species. An online survey was sent to seven professional organization listservs containing veterinarians most likely to practice on non-domestic species. Forty-one cases of euthanasia complications were reported. The most common taxa reported were mammals, (23/41, 56%), followed by avian (8/41, 20%), reptile (7/41, 17%), and fish (3/41, 7%). Most animals were reported to have been anesthetized prior to euthanasia (28/41, 68%). The most common method of euthanasia was pentobarbital (27/41, 66%). The reported euthanasia complications included “took an excessive amount of euthanasia solution” (12/41, 29%), “heart would not stop” (9/41, 22%), “animal awoke at a later time” (4/41, 10%), “a secondary method of euthanasia was required” (4/41, 10%), and “other” (12/41, 29%). This study reports complications that can occur during the euthanasia of non-domestic species. The concept of dysthanasia, a euthanasia with an undesirable outcome, has not been previously discussed in the context of zoo, wildlife, aquarium, and exotic pet practice. Strategies to reduce dysthanasia from both animal and human perspectives are explored, including alternative euthanasia techniques, principal-based euthanasia, and mental health implications.
非家养动物的安乐死并发症
很少有研究描述非家养物种的安乐死并发症。本研究的目的是调查兽医,以确定在非家养动物安乐死过程中常见的并发症。一项在线调查被发送到七个专业组织的列表服务器,其中包含最有可能对非家养物种进行实践的兽医。报告了41例安乐死并发症。最常见的分类群为哺乳动物(23/ 41,56 %),其次为鸟类(8/ 41,20 %)、爬行动物(7/ 41,17 %)和鱼类(3/ 41,7 %)。据报道,大多数动物在安乐死前被麻醉(28/41,68%)。最常见的安乐死方法是戊巴比妥(27/41,66%)。报告的安乐死并发症包括“服用过量的安乐死溶液”(12/41,29%),“心脏不会停止”(9/41,22%),“动物在晚些时候醒来”(4/41,10%),“需要二次安乐死方法”(4/41,10%)和“其他”(12/41,29%)。本研究报告了非家养动物安乐死过程中可能发生的并发症。在动物园、野生动物、水族馆和外来宠物的实践中,没有讨论过安乐死的概念,这是一种有不良后果的安乐死。从动物和人类的角度探讨了减少dysthanasia的策略,包括替代安乐死技术,基于原则的安乐死和心理健康影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信