Negativity as the Compass of Revolution: A Marxist Rejection of the No-Alternative Ethos

Saladdin Ahmed
{"title":"Negativity as the Compass of Revolution: A Marxist Rejection of the No-Alternative Ethos","authors":"Saladdin Ahmed","doi":"10.1521/siso.2022.86.3.409","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"While the famous Thatcherian slogan “There Is No Alternative” (TINA) has been widely internalized, Marxism remains capable of negating capitalism. The no-alternative ethos may be countered, from a Marxian philosophical perspective, by means of a negativity thesis framed around the following two intertwined arguments. First, capitalist hegemony is itself a reason for a revolutionary project that aims at a world in which alternatives are not thought to be impossible. Second, Marxism does not offer a prefigurative model for communism, and this is not a shortcoming but a merit: communism cannot be known positively under the limiting conditions of capitalism. Given that communism is historical, expecting an a priori model of the communist society amounts to committing an idealist fallacy.","PeriodicalId":132404,"journal":{"name":"Science & Society","volume":"62 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Science & Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1521/siso.2022.86.3.409","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

While the famous Thatcherian slogan “There Is No Alternative” (TINA) has been widely internalized, Marxism remains capable of negating capitalism. The no-alternative ethos may be countered, from a Marxian philosophical perspective, by means of a negativity thesis framed around the following two intertwined arguments. First, capitalist hegemony is itself a reason for a revolutionary project that aims at a world in which alternatives are not thought to be impossible. Second, Marxism does not offer a prefigurative model for communism, and this is not a shortcoming but a merit: communism cannot be known positively under the limiting conditions of capitalism. Given that communism is historical, expecting an a priori model of the communist society amounts to committing an idealist fallacy.
作为革命指南针的消极性:马克思主义对无选择精神的拒绝
虽然著名的撒切尔口号“别无选择”(TINA)已被广泛内化,但马克思主义仍有能力否定资本主义。从马克思主义哲学的角度来看,可以通过围绕以下两个相互交织的论点的否定论点来反驳“别无选择”的精神。首先,资本主义霸权本身就是一个革命计划的理由,该计划旨在建立一个替代方案不被认为是不可能的世界。第二,马克思主义并没有为共产主义提供一种预示性的模式,这不是缺点,而是优点:在资本主义的有限条件下,共产主义是不能被肯定地认识的。考虑到共产主义是历史的,期待共产主义社会的先验模型就等于犯了唯心主义谬误。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信