Why Hasn't the World Gotten to Yes? An Appreciation and Some Reflections

Carrie Menkel‐Meadow
{"title":"Why Hasn't the World Gotten to Yes? An Appreciation and Some Reflections","authors":"Carrie Menkel‐Meadow","doi":"10.1111/j.1571-9979.2006.00119.x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This is a review essay on the occasion of the 25th anniversary of the publication of Roger Fisher, William Ury and Bruce Patton's, Getting to Yes, which reviews the interdisciplinary field of Negotiation and how it came to be, as well as where it is heading. The review focuses on constituent questions, constituent disciplines, the legacy of GTY on theory, practice and pedagogy and discusses the issue of why more of the world's actors and institutions have not employed more integrative, problem-solving and peace seeking approaches to conflicts at all levels. It also reports, more optimistically, on the enormous contributions GTY and its progeny have made to how some people approach each other in resolving disputes and negotiating new transactions and relationships. This is a short synthesis and intellectual history of the protean interdisciplinary field of negotiation.","PeriodicalId":191231,"journal":{"name":"Law & Psychology eJournal","volume":"25 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2006-11-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"26","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Law & Psychology eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1571-9979.2006.00119.x","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 26

Abstract

This is a review essay on the occasion of the 25th anniversary of the publication of Roger Fisher, William Ury and Bruce Patton's, Getting to Yes, which reviews the interdisciplinary field of Negotiation and how it came to be, as well as where it is heading. The review focuses on constituent questions, constituent disciplines, the legacy of GTY on theory, practice and pedagogy and discusses the issue of why more of the world's actors and institutions have not employed more integrative, problem-solving and peace seeking approaches to conflicts at all levels. It also reports, more optimistically, on the enormous contributions GTY and its progeny have made to how some people approach each other in resolving disputes and negotiating new transactions and relationships. This is a short synthesis and intellectual history of the protean interdisciplinary field of negotiation.
为什么世界还没有得到肯定?欣赏与思考
这是一篇回顾文章,纪念罗杰·费雪、威廉·尤里和布鲁斯·巴顿合著的《走向Yes》出版25周年。这本书回顾了谈判的跨学科领域,它是如何形成的,以及它的发展方向。审查的重点是构成问题、构成学科、GTY在理论、实践和教学方面的遗产,并讨论了为什么世界上更多的行动者和机构没有采用更综合、解决问题和寻求和平的方法来处理各级冲突的问题。它还较为乐观地报告了GTY及其衍生产品对一些人如何在解决争端和谈判新的交易和关系时相互接触作出的巨大贡献。这是一个简短的综合和知识的历史多变的跨学科领域的谈判。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信